Software Comparisons

Kafka vs JMS
Software Comparisons

JMS vs Kafka: Which Message Broker Should You Use?

JMS vs Kafka: JMS is used to communicate between Java-based applications and other software components. Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed event..

JMS vs Kafka: which message broker is the best? JMS and Kafka are widely used message brokers to transmit data between different applications. JMS or Java Message Services is used to communicate between Java-based applications and other software components. Apache Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform used for building real-time data pipelines and streaming applications. 

This blog post will take you through the similarities and differences between JMS and Apache Kakfa to help you pick the best one. Keep reading.

What are message brokers?

Message brokers are software systems or components that facilitate the exchange of messages between different applications or components within a distributed system. They serve as intermediaries, ensuring that messages are delivered from senders to receivers efficiently and reliably. Message brokers play a crucial role in enabling asynchronous communication, decoupling sender and receiver systems, and ensuring that messages are processed in a scalable and fault-tolerant manner.

What is Apache Kafka?

What is Apache Kafka?

What is Apache Kafka?

Apache Kafka is a distributed streaming system that enables you to pass messages from one point to another. Kafka maintains a stream of records within a cluster of servers, offering a robust logging mechanism for distributed systems. Kafka helps users publish and subscribe to streams of records, process records in real time, and store streams of records. With Apache Kafka, developers can create streaming data applications and pipelines.

What is JMS?

What is JMS?

What is JMS?

Java Message Service or JMS is an API that facilitates communication between Java-based applications and other software components. JMS comes with pre-defined messaging protocols that support the Java programming language. The messaging standard allows users to create, send, receive, and read messages between computers in a network. With JMS, developers can make software applications written in different programming languages talk to each other.

Similarities between Kafka and JMS

While the architecture and design of these popular message brokers are different, there are a few similarities between the two. Let’s take a look:

  1. Messaging Middleware: Both Kafka and JMS are messaging middleware solutions used to facilitate communication between different components or systems in a distributed architecture. They provide a way to send, receive, and process messages asynchronously.
  2. Message Brokers: Kafka and JMS both involve the use of message brokers. In the case of Kafka, it’s Apache Kafka, and for JMS, it can be various JMS providers like Apache ActiveMQ, RabbitMQ, or IBM MQ. These brokers are responsible for managing the routing and delivery of messages.
  3. Messaging Patterns: Both Kafka and JMS support common messaging patterns, such as publish-subscribe and point-to-point messaging. While Kafka primarily focuses on publish-subscribe, JMS provides support for both patterns, making it versatile for various use cases.
  4. Message Durability: Both Kafka and JMS can be configured to provide message durability. Kafka stores messages for a configurable retention period, ensuring data availability even after consumption. JMS offers message persistence options to prevent data loss.
  5. Integration: Kafka and JMS can be integrated with various programming languages and frameworks, making them suitable for a wide range of applications. Kafka clients are available in multiple languages, and JMS provides a standardized API for Java applications.
  6. Scaling: Both Kafka and JMS can be scaled to handle increased message volumes. Kafka achieves scalability through horizontal scaling by adding more broker nodes, while JMS implementations may offer scalability options depending on the provider.
  7. Acknowledgment: Both Kafka and JMS allow for acknowledgment mechanisms. Producers can receive acknowledgments when messages are successfully delivered and processed, ensuring reliable communication.
  8. Message Transformation: Both Kafka and JMS offer ways to transform message formats. Kafka supports various serialization formats, and JMS may provide message conversion capabilities.

Now that we know what’s similar, let’s head to the differences between JMS vs Kafka and see which one’s better for your needs.

JMS vs Kafka: Differences

Major Differences between JMS vs Kafka

Major Differences between JMS vs Kafka

Let’s see the major difference between JMS and Kafka and get to know which of the two message brokers will be a better choice for your business requirements.

  1. Apache Kafka vs JMS: Style of programming

    JMS adheres to an imperative programming style. Developers write specific code to solve particular problems, executing a series of instructions sequentially. JMS operations often occur synchronously, with the sender waiting for acknowledgment of message receipt and processing. This style is well-suited for applications where precise control over the order of operations is critical.

    Kafka follows a reactive programming style, which revolves around asynchronous data streams and event-driven processing. Developers work with data as it flows through the system, and events trigger actions across the application. Kafka leverages reactive programming libraries and frameworks to handle events efficiently. This style suits real-time data processing and event-driven architectures.
  2. JMS vs Kafka: Segregating the Content

    JMS segregates content using queues and topics. Queues are typically used for point-to-point messaging, ensuring that messages are delivered to one consumer. Topics are used for publish-subscribe messaging, allowing multiple subscribers to receive the same message.

    Kafka segregates content using topics. Topics allow for the categorization of messages into different streams, enabling efficient routing and processing of related data. Producers and consumers subscribe to specific topics of interest, facilitating a publish-subscribe model.
  3. Type of Message Programming

    JMS traditionally deals with messages in text or binary format. While custom serialization is possible, it may require additional configuration and implementation effort compared to Kafka.

    Kafka supports messages in various formats, such as Avro, JSON, or custom serialization and deserialization. This flexibility enables developers to work with data in the format that best suits their needs, making it versatile for different use cases.
  4. JMS vs Kafka: Filter Method

    JMS provides message selectors for filtering messages. However, the effectiveness of filtering may vary depending on the JMS provider. JMS selectors are more suitable for simple filtering criteria.

    Kafka offers robust filtering capabilities through Kafka Streams or consumer group subscriptions. Kafka Streams provides a powerful stream processing API for data transformation and filtering. Consumer groups allow multiple consumers to subscribe to topics, each receiving a copy of the data, enabling parallel processing and filtering.
  5. Routing System

    JMS offers both point-to-point and publish-subscribe routing mechanisms. Queues are used for point-to-point communication, ensuring that a message is delivered to only one consumer. Topics are used for publish-subscribe communication, where multiple subscribers can receive the same message.

    Kafka employs a publish-subscribe model with topic-based routing. Producers publish messages to topics, and consumers subscribe to specific topics of interest. This approach simplifies message distribution in a distributed system.
  6. JMS vs Kafka: Storage

    JMS typically does not retain messages beyond delivery. Message persistence depends on the specific JMS broker configuration. In some cases, additional setup may be required to achieve message durability.

    Kafka provides durable message storage with configurable retention periods. Messages are stored for a specified duration, allowing consumers to replay historical data. This feature is valuable for applications that require data auditing, analytics, or replayability.
  7. Apache Kafka vs JMS: Queuing

    JMS excels in queuing scenarios. It offers point-to-point messaging with guaranteed message delivery. Queues ensure that each message is consumed by only one recipient, making JMS suitable for scenarios where strict message ordering and processing are essential.

    While Kafka can mimic queuing behavior using single-consumer consumer groups, it is primarily designed for publish-subscribe patterns. Queuing behavior can be achieved with a single consumer per partition.
  8. Partitioning of Topics

    JMS topics do not natively support partitioning. Scalability in JMS is typically achieved by deploying multiple instances of a topic, and each instance is responsible for handling a subset of messages.

    Kafka allows topics to be partitioned, enabling parallelism and scalability in message processing. Each partition can be handled by a separate consumer, ensuring efficient distribution of work.
  9. Message Logs

    Message durability in JMS depends on the broker’s configuration. While JMS brokers offer message persistence, the level of persistence may vary between different JMS providers.

    Kafka acts as a distributed commit log, making all messages persistent by default. It provides strong durability guarantees, ensuring that messages are not lost even in the case of broker failures.
  10. Apache Kafka vs JMS: Scalability and Availability

    The scalability and availability of JMS implementations can vary. Achieving high availability often requires configuring redundancy and failover mechanisms. Scalability may also vary depending on the specific JMS provider and deployment architecture.

    Kafka is designed for horizontal scalability, allowing you to add more brokers to handle increased load. This design makes Kafka highly scalable and available. Kafka’s distributed architecture ensures fault tolerance and high availability.

JMS vs Kafka: What should you choose?

The choice between JMS (Java Message Service) and Kafka (Apache Kafka) depends on various factors, including the specific requirements and use cases of the company. Both JMS and Kafka have their strengths and weaknesses, so the decision should be made based on the following considerations:

  1. Messaging Style and Use Case

    • Choose JMS if: Your company primarily deals with traditional enterprise messaging scenarios, requires strict point-to-point messaging, or needs a standardized API for Java-based applications. JMS is well-suited for scenarios where precise control over message ordering and processing is critical.
    • Choose Kafka if: Your company focuses on real-time data streaming, event-driven architectures, log aggregation, or needs to handle large volumes of data efficiently. Kafka excels in scenarios where you want to process data as it flows through the system and requires horizontal scalability.
  2. Scalability and Volume

    • Choose JMS if: Your company’s messaging volume is moderate, and you don’t require extensive scalability. JMS can be scaled, but it may require more effort and custom configurations to achieve high scalability.
    • Choose Kafka if: Your company deals with high message volumes, requires horizontal scalability, and needs a system capable of handling massive data streams efficiently. Kafka’s architecture is designed for scalability and high throughput.
  3. Message Persistence and Retention

    • Choose JMS if: Message durability and persistence are a primary concern, and your company relies on the JMS provider’s features for message storage. JMS brokers often provide configurable message persistence options.
    • Choose Kafka if: You need both durability and the ability to retain messages for extended periods. Kafka retains messages for a configurable retention period, making it suitable for use cases that require data auditing, analytics, or data replay.
  4. Programming Paradigm

    • Choose JMS if: Your development team is more familiar with an imperative programming style and you are comfortable with writing sequential code for messaging operations.
    • Choose Kafka if: Your development team is comfortable with a reactive programming style and is looking to leverage event-driven processing, asynchronous data streams, and reactive libraries.
  5. Ecosystem and Integration

    • Choose JMS if: You require a messaging solution that integrates seamlessly with Java-based technologies and frameworks. JMS has a long history of integration with the Java ecosystem.
    • Choose Kafka if: You need a broader ecosystem with connectors, stream processing tools like Kafka Streams, and extensive monitoring solutions. Kafka offers a rich set of tools and libraries for various integration scenarios.
  6. Vendor Neutrality

    • Choose Kafka if: Your company prefers an open-source, vendor-neutral solution that is not tied to a specific vendor.
    • Choose JMS if: You are comfortable with vendor-specific JMS implementations and don’t require vendor neutrality.

JMS vs Kafka: Conclusion

In the end, the decision between JMS and Kafka boils down to your specific needs and goals. If you’re looking for a messaging system that’s like following a well-structured recipe, ensuring messages are delivered with precision and control, then JMS is your choice. It’s like cooking with a detailed cookbook, step by step, ensuring everything happens in a particular order.

On the other hand, if your applications thrive on real-time data streams, massive data volumes, and a dynamic, event-driven environment, then Kafka steps in. Think of Kafka as the express highway for data, where information flows rapidly and asynchronously, connecting everything seamlessly. Moreover, it’s open-source and integrates effortlessly with various technologies, making it incredibly versatile.

So, whether you opt for the meticulous orchestration of JMS or the high-speed, data-centric nature of Kafka, both serve as reliable messengers, facilitating seamless communication between your applications. Your choice ultimately depends on the conversation you want your applications to have – structured and precise or dynamic and data-intensive.

If you’re a skilled developer looking for remote  JMS jobs or Apache Kakfa jobs, try Turing today. Work with some of the best US companies, earn salaries higher than the market average, and enjoy a fantastic work-life balance.


FAQs

  1. What is the difference between JMS and Kafka?

    JMS (Java Message Service) is an API for messaging in Java applications, while Kafka is an open-source distributed event streaming platform. JMS is suited for traditional messaging, while Kafka excels in real-time data streaming and handling large data volumes.
  2. What is the purpose of JMS?

    JMS facilitates communication between Java-based applications and other software components, providing standardized messaging protocols.
  3. What is the replacement of JMS?

    JMS doesn’t have a direct replacement, but Kafka and other messaging systems can offer alternative solutions based on specific use cases.
  4. What is Kafka used for?

    Kafka is used for building real-time data pipelines, streaming applications, and log aggregation. It enables publishing, subscribing, and processing data streams.
  5. What is JMS used for?

    JMS is used for point-to-point and publish-subscribe messaging between Java-based applications, ensuring reliable and ordered message delivery.
  6. Which is better JMS or Kafka?

    The choice between JMS and Kafka depends on specific use cases. JMS suits traditional messaging, while Kafka excels in real-time data streaming, making one better than the other based on project requirements.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 20, 2023
Go vs C# Which One to choose
Software Comparisons

C# vs Golang: Which Is the Best Web Development Language?

Go is an open-source, compiled, and statically written programming language by Google while C# is an object-oriented programming language by Microsoft

Golang and C# are two of the most popular languages among software developers across the world. Golang by Google and C# by Microsoft has been a topic of hot debate. As a developer, you may have several questions about the programming languages. Is C# faster than Golang? Will Golang replace C#? Is Go the best programming language? Should I learn C# or Go? Which is better in Go vs C#? This blog post will answer all your questions, compare the similarities and differences between the two, and help you choose the best one for your project. 

What is C#?

What is C#?

What is C#?

C# is a contemporary, object-oriented programming language designed by Microsoft. C#, pronounced as C-sharp is general-purpose and multi-paradigm. It encompasses static typing, lexically scoped, imperative, strong typing, functional, generic, declarative, object-oriented, and component-oriented programming disciplines.

What is Go?

What is Go?

What is Go?

Golang, also known as Go, is an open-source, statically typed, and compiled programming language designed at Google by Rob Pike, Robert Griesemer, and Ken Thompson. Golang or Go is syntactically similar to C, but only with garbage collection, structural typing, memory safety, and CSP-style concurrency.

Similarities between Go and C#

Go (Golang) and C# are two distinct programming languages, but they share some similarities, particularly in terms of capabilities and features. Here are some of the key similarities between Go and C#:

  1. Strong Typing

    Both Go and C# are statically typed languages, meaning variable types are determined at compile-time. This helps catch type-related errors early in the development process and can lead to more robust code.
  2. Garbage Collection

    Both languages incorporate automatic garbage collection, relieving developers from manual memory management tasks. This makes it easier to write code without worrying about memory leaks or deallocation issues.
  3. Concurrency Support

    Both Go and C# provide built-in support for concurrent programming. Go is known for its goroutines and channels, while C# offers features like the Task Parallel Library (TPL) and asynchronous programming (async/await). These features simplify the development of multithreaded and concurrent applications.
  4. Standard Libraries

    Both languages come with extensive standard libraries that cover a wide range of functionality. These libraries make it easier for developers to perform common tasks without relying heavily on third-party packages or libraries.
  5. Cross-Platform Compatibility

    While Go is particularly praised for its cross-platform compatibility, C# has expanded its cross-platform capabilities with .NET Core and .NET 5+. This means that both languages can be used to develop applications that run on multiple operating systems, such as Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  6. Language Simplicity

    Both Go and C# prioritize simplicity and readability in their syntax. While C# offers a broader feature set due to its longer history and ties to C/C++, it still maintains a relatively clean and understandable syntax. Go, with its minimalist design, is especially lauded for its simplicity and ease of reading and writing code.
  7. Concurrency and Parallelism

    Both languages offer features for concurrent and parallel programming. While the specifics differ, they share the goal of simplifying the development of scalable, high-performance applications that can take advantage of modern multicore processors.
  8. Community and Documentation

    Both Go and C# have active and supportive developer communities. They offer comprehensive documentation, tutorials, and resources, making it easier for developers to learn and work with these languages.
  9. Unit Testing

    Both languages emphasize the importance of unit testing. Go has a built-in testing package, and C# has popular unit testing frameworks like NUnit, xUnit, and MSTest. This shared emphasis on testing helps ensure code quality and maintainability.
  10. Performance

    While the specific performance characteristics vary depending on the use case and implementation, both Go and C# are designed to provide good runtime performance. Go’s efficient compilation and C#’s Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation contribute to their respective performance strengths.

While there are some similarities, the Golang vs C# comparison is yet to unfold. Let’s take a look at the differences between the two languages.

Related post: Top Golang Interview Questions with Answers to Prepare for Your Next Interview

Go vs C#: What are the differences between the two programming languages?

Go vs C# Comparison

Go vs C# Comparison

  1. Code Compilation

    Go compiles its code into operating system-specific native binaries, resulting in efficient, standalone executables that require no external runtimes. This characteristic makes Go applications highly portable and easy to distribute.

    On the other hand, C# code can be compiled into cross-platform binaries, but it typically necessitates the presence of the .NET Core or .NET 5+ runtime on the target system. Depending on the target operating system, the compilation process may generate platform-specific binaries.

    This means C# applications can be more dependent on external runtimes compared to Go, potentially affecting portability.
  2. Error Handling

    Go takes a straightforward and explicit approach to error handling. Functions commonly return errors as a second value, encouraging developers to diligently check and handle errors in their code. While this promotes robust error handling practices, it can lead to code verbosity.

    In contrast, C# employs a traditional try-catch exception handling mechanism, relying on keywords like try, catch, finally, and throw. This approach allows for fine-grained exception handling but often results in more complex code due to the need for try-catch blocks.
  3. Go vs C#: Performance

    Go stands out for its remarkable runtime performance. Its native code compilation ensures speedy execution, making it perfect for applications that require quick responses. Go’s minimalistic design and strong typing contribute to efficient code execution with minimal overhead. Moreover, Go’s built-in support for concurrency via goroutines and channels simplifies the development of highly responsive and parallel applications.

    On the other hand, although C# uses Just-In-Time (JIT) compilation, which may slightly affect startup times, optimized C# code demonstrates robust performance during extended operations. The extensive .NET ecosystem empowers developers with specialized libraries and frameworks. On Windows, C# leverages platform-specific optimizations, making it a solid choice for desktop applications and enterprise-level software. Additionally, C# offers features for parallel programming, enabling efficient code parallelization.
  4. Code Syntax

    Go’s syntax is minimalist, emphasizing readability and simplicity, often likened to Python. Its strong typing and concise constructs contribute to clean and straightforward code.

    In contrast, C# boasts a more feature-rich syntax, drawing inspiration from C/C++. While this richness grants developers a broader range of capabilities, it can require more time to master due to its extensive feature set and complexity.
  5. Graphical User Interface (GUI)

    Go lacks a native Graphical User Interface (GUI) library, making it less suitable for GUI-intensive applications. Developing GUI applications in Go often entails the use of third-party libraries. Go shines in backend development and command-line tools.

    On the other hand, C# excels in GUI development, particularly for Windows-based applications. It offers extensive support for creating native GUI interfaces using frameworks like Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) and Windows Forms, making it a strong choice for desktop applications requiring a rich, native GUI.
  6. Golang vs C#: Unit Testing

    Go has built-in support for unit testing via its testing package, simplifying the writing and execution of tests. The “go test” command streamlines test execution and report generation, promoting a seamless testing process.

    C# also supports unit testing through frameworks like NUnit, xUnit, and MSTest. These frameworks offer advanced features for unit testing but often require more involved setup and configuration compared to Go’s native testing support.
  7. Documentation

    Go features a built-in documentation generator known as “Godoc,” which automates the creation of documentation by parsing Go source code and accompanying comments. Godoc generates plain text and HTML documentation, facilitating documentation maintenance and sharing.

    In contrast, C# relies on XML comments to document code. Developers annotate their code with comments, and the C# compiler generates XML documentation files at compile time. While documentation is available in C#, setting up and generating documentation can be more complex compared to Go’s straightforward Godoc tool.
  8. Ecosystem and Libraries

    Go boasts a growing ecosystem of open-source libraries and packages accessible through the Go module system. Its extensive standard library covers various programming aspects, reducing external dependencies. Popular packages like “gorilla/mux” for web routing and “gorm” for database access enhance the development experience.

    Conversely, C# leverages the extensive .NET ecosystem, offering libraries and packages through NuGet. The .NET Core and .NET 5+ ecosystems have seen significant growth, providing a broad range of tools, including ASP.NET Core for web development and Entity Framework Core for data access. Widely-used libraries like Newtonsoft.Json for JSON serialization and NUnit for unit testing contribute to C#’s rich ecosystem.
  9. Golang vs C#: Deployment and DevOps

    Go compiles into native, standalone binaries, simplifying deployment without the need for additional runtimes. Tools like Docker and Kubernetes are popular choices for containerization and orchestration of Go applications, aligning well with DevOps principles.

    C# applications can be deployed as standalone binaries or web applications, often requiring the .NET runtime. Docker is a common choice for containerizing .NET applications, and platforms like Azure DevOps facilitate DevOps pipelines. C# applications can be hosted on various cloud platforms like Azure and AWS, offering flexibility in deployment options.
  10. Platform and Operating System Support

    Go is renowned for its cross-platform compatibility, supporting major operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS. This versatility makes it suitable for developing applications across different platforms seamlessly.

    C# traditionally had strong ties to Windows but expanded its cross-platform support with .NET Core and .NET 5+. These versions run on Windows, Linux, and macOS, broadening the range of platforms where C# applications can be deployed.
  11. Security Features

    Go places a strong emphasis on security through its simplicity and memory safety. Its memory safety features help prevent common security vulnerabilities like buffer overflows. Additionally, the static code analysis tool, “go vet,” can identify potential security issues in Go code.

    In contrast, C# benefits from security features provided by the .NET runtime, including type safety and code access security. The newer .NET Core and .NET 5+ versions continue to enhance security with improved cryptography support and security protocols.
  12. Go vs C#: IDE and Development Environment

    Go developers often favor lightweight and efficient code editors like Visual Studio Code or GoLand. These editors offer Go-specific plugins and extensions, streamlining the development experience. The Go toolchain, including “go fmt” for code formatting and “go test” for unit testing, simplifies development tasks.

    On the other hand, C# developers frequently rely on integrated development environments (IDEs) such as Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. Visual Studio provides extensive features for C# development, including debugging, profiling, and GUI design tools for Windows applications. Visual Studio Code offers a lighter alternative with a robust extension ecosystem, including support for C# language features.

Related post: Top 21 C# Interview Questions and Answers for 2022

Go vs C#: Which one should you choose?

Given the similarities between C# and Golang, your final pick should be based on your project specifications. So, ensure you understand the advantages and disadvantages of each before deciding between the two languages.

C# excels with Windows desktop applications and is frequently utilized in monolithic back-end web development. On the other hand, Golang is ideal for creating massive back-end systems and cross-platform solutions.

Go excels in scenarios where simplicity, portability, and rapid runtime performance are essential. It’s ideal for backend services, microservices, and applications requiring low-latency responses, thanks to its minimalist syntax and robust concurrency support.

On the other hand, C# stands out in Windows desktop application development and offers extensive GUI support through Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) and Windows Forms. It also has an upper hand in web development, especially with the cross-platform capabilities of .NET Core and .NET 5+.

Go and C# both have the bandwidth necessary to be used in web development. However, your choice will ultimately depend on your solution architecture, the operating environment, and the resources you have to construct your application.

If you wish to work on exciting development projects and boost your engineering career, try Turing.com. Turing provides fantastic remote job opportunities in top US companies. Visit the Jobs page for more details.


FAQs on Go vs C#

  1. Is Go faster than C#?

    The raw CPU speed of Golang is relatively similar to C#. However, Go code’s straightforward design and native compilation use far less memory and compiles much faster than C#’s code.
  2. Is Go the best programming language?

    Go is the ideal option for all types of developers due to its speed, simplicity, and dependability in a complicated design.
  3. Should I learn C# or Go?

    The coding syntax of Go and C# comes from C. However, Go is far easier to read and write than C# code, and many developers compare it to Python. 
  4. Is C# better than Golang?

    It depends on your requirements. C# excels in Windows-based applications and has a rich ecosystem. Go, on the other hand, is known for its simplicity, performance, and suitability for backend services. Choose C# for Windows development and Go for cross-platform or performance-critical tasks. 
  5. Does C# have a future?

    Yes, C# has a promising future. With continuous updates and the evolution of .NET Core into .NET 5+ for cross-platform development, C# remains a relevant choice for various applications, including desktop, web, and cloud-based.
  6. Does Golang have a future?

    Golang (Go) has a bright future as well. Its simplicity, strong performance, and suitability for cloud-native and microservices architecture make it increasingly popular. With growing support and adoption, Go is well-positioned for the future.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By , Sep 14, 2023
ChatGPT vs Software Developers Is It the End of the Road for Developers (6)
Software Comparisons

ChatGPT vs Software Developers: Is Generative AI the End of the Road for Developers?

GPT 3 vs GPT 4, what are the major updates? And the most important question: Will generative AI replace developers? Let’s find out.

Generative AI has taken the world by storm. Yes, we’re talking about Open AI’s ChatGPT4. With tech giants like Google and Microsoft introducing Bard and AI-powered Bing, the AI space is only getting hotter! But what impact will AI have on software development and developer jobs? Most importantly, is AI going to replace software developers? 

Every technology is aimed at improving the efficiency of its users.  AI is no different. Using generative AI, software developers can increase their productivity, write better code, and meet high user expectations. 

Generative AI can improve developers’ productivity by 10 folds!

Can generative AI make developers more productive?

Can AI make developers more productive?

A prediction by Ark Invest states that AI can boost developers’ performance and increase their productivity by up to 10 folds! Jobs that require recurring coding can be automated with the help of AI. This can reduce the turnaround time for writing code from scratch, thus enhancing the productivity of software developers. Developers can utilize this time and create codes that require creative thinking that only a human mind is capable of. They can leverage AI to check for syntax errors, write clean code, debug code, and many more basic requirements. 

As we know, resuing a code can accelerate the software development process. Developers can also use generative AI to enhance code reusability. Generative AI can find the section of the code that can be reused and can tailor it to meet the requirements of another software development process.

Generative AI and software development: Don’t fear AI

Marko Anastov, the co-founder of Semaphore CI/CD, states that generative AI tools such as ChatGPT have created fear amongst the developer community. He says that some developers are worried that AI will take their jobs, while others are completely ignoring it. Both approaches are wrong, according to Anastov. He says that developers should integrate AI into their workflow to increase their productivity. GitHub Copilot is a great example of this. The AI I pair programmer has proven beneficial in writing clean code faster. The GitHub Copilot is powered by OpenAI’s Codex, which is a generative language model. 

Generative AI lacks what you have: Context!

Generative AI lacks what you have Context!

Generative AI lacks what you have: context!

Generative AI and software development can go hand-in-hand, but AI cannot completely perform the tasks on its own. Currently, AI is powered by the data that is fed to it, and not by any human intelligence. Generative AIs like ChatGPT lack the understanding of the human context of computing. Therefore, it requires software developers to add more details and create an appropriate experience through the software. 

Where can software developers leverage AI?

Generative AI GPT4

How to leverage AI as a software developer?

There’s so much you can do with generative AI to make the most of your software development career

  • Use AI to improve your product’s UX

    One thing that ChatGPT and other generative AI have and will keep on improving is the way they interact with the user. If you have a software application that requires interaction with the user using a search bar or something like that, you will have to upgrade it.

    You can integrate generative AI into your software applications to improve the way you interact with your users.
  • Generative AI cannot write the whole code on its own! You need to intervene!

    While the AI is already writing codes and creating apps, it is simply scanning through the already provided database to do so. To create a breakthrough or to execute more sophisticated codes, software developers will have to intervene.

    They can use AI to create basic code and enhance it according to the requirements using their own skills. If you’re a software developer reading this, this is the time to enhance your tech stack with AI development skills.  
  • Finding syntax errors in a code is troublesome, use AI for that!

    So you have written a long code but it’s not working for some reason. Now, this could be because of a syntax error or something like that.  But finding these small errors is a tough task. Let AI do it for you. Generative AI is capable of finding syntax errors in a code using machine learning techniques. Generative AI tools like DeepCode scans your code and recommend fixes for the syntax errors in your code thus improving your productivity.

What is GPT-4?

GPT-4, or Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4, is the next iteration of OpenAI’s language model following GPT-3. It builds upon the advancements and capabilities of its predecessor while introducing several notable improvements.

What programming languages does GPT-4 know?

As an AI language model, GPT-4 does not inherently “know” or comprehend programming languages like a human programmer. GPT-4 is trained on a vast amount of text data from the internet, which includes examples of code written in various programming languages. Therefore, it can generate text that resembles programming code or provide assistance with programming-related queries.

However, it’s important to note that GPT-4’s proficiency in generating code or assisting with programming tasks is limited to the patterns and examples it has learned during training. It does not possess practical programming knowledge, understanding of specific language syntax, or the ability to debug or execute code. For programming-related tasks, it’s recommended to consult dedicated programming resources and tools that are specifically designed for programming languages.

GPT-3 vs GPT-4: What are the major differences?

  1. Enhanced Contextual Understanding:

    GPT-4 demonstrates superior contextual understanding, resulting in more coherent and relevant responses compared to GPT-3. The training of GPT-4 on a broader and more diversified dataset allows it to grasp the complex context and provide more contextually suitable material.
  2. Increased Parameter Count:

    GPT-4 surpasses GPT-3 in terms of parameter count, allowing for capturing finer nuances of language. The higher parameter count translates to more accurate and nuanced responses, giving the generated content a more natural and human-like feel.
  3. Specialization in Domains:

    While GPT-3 excels in versatility across various domains, GPT-4 focuses on specialization in specific areas. GPT-4 undergoes fine-tuning for specific use cases, leading to improved performance and domain-specific expertise.
  4. Addressing Limitations:

    GPT-4 addresses limitations observed in GPT-3, such as the occasional generation of incorrect or biased information. Stricter guidelines and quality control measures are implemented to mitigate these issues, ensuring more reliable and unbiased content generation.
  5. Improved Quality Control:

    GPT-4 undergoes rigorous scrutiny and quality control measures to enhance the accuracy and reliability of generated content. OpenAI’s investment in refining the training process helps minimize potential errors and biases in the generated text.
  6. Progress in Naturalness and Coherence:

    GPT-4 exhibits advancements in generating more natural and coherent responses compared to GPT-3. The improved contextual understanding and higher parameter count contribute to generating text that feels closer to human-generated content.
  7. Continued Learning from Human Input:

    GPT-4 builds upon the success of GPT-3 by learning from vast amounts of human-generated content available on the internet. The ongoing learning process allows GPT-4 to continually refine its language generation capabilities.
  8. Potential for Specialized Applications:

    GPT-4’s specialization in domains opens up possibilities for improved performance in specific areas, catering to diverse industry needs. Its increased capacity and expertise make it a promising tool for various applications, such as content generation, customer support, and more.

GPT 4: Use Cases

GPT-4, with its advanced language generation capabilities, finds utility in a wide range of real-world applications. Here are some notable use cases where GPT-4 can make a significant impact:

  1. Content Generation and Copywriting:

    GPT-4 can assist in generating high-quality content for articles, blog posts, social media captions, and marketing materials. It can aid copywriters by providing creative suggestions, refining drafts, and maintaining consistent brand tone and style.
  2. Customer Support and Chatbots:

    GPT-4 can power chatbots and virtual assistants, offering more accurate and human-like interactions with customers. It can handle customer inquiries, provide product information, and offer personalized recommendations, improving customer satisfaction.
  3. Language Translation and Interpretation:

    GPT-4’s language understanding and generation capabilities make it valuable for machine translation services. It can aid in translating text or even facilitate real-time interpretation during conversations or meetings.
  4. Personalized Recommendations:

    GPT-4’s contextual understanding allows it to provide personalized recommendations in various domains, such as movies, books, music, or products. It can consider individual preferences, past behavior, and user feedback to suggest tailored options.
  5. Creative Writing and Storytelling:

    GPT-4 can collaborate with writers, assisting in brainstorming ideas, developing characters, and creating engaging narratives. It can be a valuable tool for authors, screenwriters, and content creators looking for inspiration and story prompts. 
  6. Academic and Technical Writing:

    GPT-4 can aid students and researchers in generating academic papers, essays, and technical documentation. It can assist in organizing information, suggesting references, and providing language refinement.
  7. Virtual Simulation and Training:

    GPT-4’s ability to generate realistic and contextually appropriate responses makes it suitable for virtual simulations and training scenarios. It can act as an interactive virtual character, providing real-time feedback, guidance, and simulations of different situations.
  8. Content Moderation:

    GPT-4 can help in automating content moderation tasks by identifying and flagging potentially inappropriate or harmful content. It can assist in reducing the workload of human moderators and improving the efficiency of moderation processes.

Limitations of GPT4: Can GPT4 replace developers?

Startups across the globe are leveraging the capabilities of GPT4 to reduce their reliance on human coders and cut costs. By using GPT-4, these companies can automate coding tasks and generate code snippets for various applications. The improved contextual understanding and increased parameter count of GPT-4 enable it to produce more accurate and nuanced code. Startups can benefit from GPT-4’s ability to generate code quickly, handle repetitive tasks, and provide suggestions for code optimization. While GPT-4 is not a substitute for human coders, it offers a viable solution for startups with limited resources, allowing them to allocate their funds more efficiently. 

However, there are several limitations due to which GPT4 cannot replace programmers and developers entirely. Let’s list a few of them down:

  1. Lack of Domain-Specific Knowledge: GPT-4 lacks the practical understanding and domain-specific knowledge that programmers and developers possess. While it can generate code snippets, it may not comprehend the underlying concepts, best practices, or intricate details of specific programming languages or frameworks.
  2. Limited Debugging and Troubleshooting Abilities: GPT-4 focuses on code generation but does not have the capability to debug or troubleshoot code. Identifying and resolving complex errors, logical issues, or performance bottlenecks often require human expertise and a deep understanding of the codebase.
  3. Incomplete Context Awareness: GPT-4’s language generation relies heavily on the provided context. If the context is insufficient or ambiguous, it may produce inaccurate or nonsensical code. Programmers and developers possess the ability to grasp the broader context, project requirements, and user expectations, allowing them to make informed decisions while writing code.
  4. Maintenance and Long-Term Support: Software development involves ongoing maintenance, updates, and bug fixes. GPT-4’s limited abilities make it challenging to maintain and evolve complex software systems over time. Programmers and developers possess the knowledge and experience required for long-term support and future-proofing of applications.
  5. Collaboration and Problem-Solving: Programming often involves collaborative efforts, brainstorming, and problem-solving as a team. GPT-4 lacks the ability to actively participate in such discussions, share insights, or provide creative solutions beyond generating code snippets.
  6. Creativity and Innovation: While GPT-4 can assist in generating code based on existing patterns, it may not possess the creativity and innovation required for groundbreaking solutions or developing entirely new algorithms or approaches. Programmers and developers excel at thinking outside the box and pushing the boundaries of what is possible.

Therefore it’s safe to say that GPT4 or GPT3 or any other AI cannot completely replace developers or programmers. AI is made in order to assist humans and not replace them. Therefore, developers should be focusing on learning how to use GPT4 to increase their productivity.

What is prompt engineering? 

Prompt engineering refers to the process of crafting effective prompts or instructions to guide AI language models in generating desired outputs. It involves formulating specific input instructions or queries that help elicit the desired information or responses from the model.

Prompt engineering is crucial for achieving accurate and relevant results from AI models. By carefully constructing prompts, developers can guide the model’s behavior, context, or style of response. This process often involves iteratively refining and testing prompts to optimize the output quality and align it with the intended purpose.

Effective prompt engineering requires an understanding of the underlying model’s capabilities, limitations, and tendencies. It involves considering the right balance between specificity and generality in prompts to achieve the desired results without excessively constraining the model’s creativity or flexibility.

Is prompt engineering a good career choice?

Generative AI GPT4

Is prompt engineering a good career choice?

Prompt engineering is a specialized field within the realm of AI and natural language processing that offers promising career prospects. As AI language models continue to advance, the demand for professionals skilled in prompt engineering is expected to grow. Here are a few reasons why prompt engineering can be a good career choice:

  1. It has tremendous demand worldwide: As AI language models advance, the demand for prompt engineering professionals is on the rise, creating exciting career prospects in the field.
  2. It equips you with niche expertise: With deep knowledge of AI language models, prompt engineers optimize outputs by designing effective prompts, making them sought-after professionals with specialized skills.
  3. It is versatile and applicable across domains: Prompt engineering finds application in diverse domains such as content generation, chatbots, and customer support systems, offering professionals the chance to work on a wide range of projects.
  4. It provides a collaborative environment: Working alongside data scientists, machine learning engineers, and domain experts, prompt engineers engage in interdisciplinary collaboration, fostering knowledge sharing and exposure to varied perspectives.
  5. It motivates you to become a continuous learner: Prompt engineering necessitates staying abreast of the latest advancements, techniques, and best practices in the rapidly evolving field of AI, providing ongoing opportunities for learning and skill development.
  6. It enables you to build impactful applications: By optimizing AI language models’ performance through effective prompt engineering, professionals contribute to real-world applications, witnessing the tangible impact of their work.

What skills do you need to become a prompt engineer?

What skills do you need to become a prompt engineer

What skills do you need to become a prompt engineer?

Becoming a proficient prompt engineer requires a combination of technical skills, domain knowledge, and problem-solving abilities. Here are key skills that can contribute to success in prompt engineering:

  1. Natural Language Processing (NLP): A solid understanding of NLP concepts, including language modeling, text generation, and sentiment analysis, is essential. Proficiency in NLP techniques and algorithms enables effective prompt design and optimization.
  2. Programming and Scripting: Strong programming skills are vital for prompt engineering. Proficiency in languages such as Python allows prompt engineers to work with AI frameworks, preprocess data, and develop scripts for prompt generation and analysis.
  3. AI and Machine Learning: Knowledge of AI principles and machine learning algorithms is crucial. Understanding how AI language models, such as GPT-4, function, and their underlying architecture empowers prompt engineers to design effective prompts and fine-tune models if necessary.
  4. Data Analysis and Evaluation: Proficiency in data analysis techniques, including statistical analysis and evaluation metrics, helps assess the performance and quality of prompt-engineered outputs. The ability to interpret and draw insights from data aids in iterative prompt refinement.
  5. Domain Expertise: Familiarity with the specific domain in which prompt engineering is applied is advantageous. Having knowledge of industry-specific language conventions, technical jargon, or specific application requirements enables the design of prompts that align with domain-specific contexts.
  6. Creativity and Problem-Solving: Prompt engineering often requires creative thinking and problem-solving skills. Being able to devise innovative prompts, identify challenges, and find solutions to optimize model responses are valuable assets.
  7. Communication and Collaboration: Strong communication skills facilitate effective collaboration with data scientists, developers, and domain experts. Prompt engineers must effectively communicate prompt requirements, provide feedback, and work in interdisciplinary teams.
  8. Adaptability and Continuous Learning: Prompt engineering is a rapidly evolving field. Being adaptable to new technologies, techniques, and advancements in AI is crucial. A commitment to continuous learning and staying updated with the latest research and best practices is essential for professional growth.

Also, read: IT Hiring Trends 2022-23: 10 Most In-Demand Skills in US Companies 

What are some best practices for prompt engineering?

Generative AI GPT4

What are some best practices for prompt engineering?

Prompt engineering plays a crucial role in obtaining desired outputs from AI language models. You must follow some best practices to achieve the best results while using AI. Here are the best practices for prompt engineering.

  1. Context Window: Ensure that the relevant context is provided within the prompt. If the context is too long, the model may truncate or lose important information. Experiment with different context lengths to find the optimal balance.
  2. System Messages: Utilize system messages to provide additional instructions or context to the model. System messages are separate from user prompts and allow you to set the behavior or persona of the AI. Using explicit system messages can guide the model’s responses more effectively.
  3. Token Limit Considerations: Pay attention to the token count in both the prompt and the response. Language models have token limits, and longer prompts may result in truncated or incomplete responses. Keep track of the token count to ensure that the generated content remains within the model’s limits.
  4. Fine-Tuning: In some cases, fine-tuning the base language model may be necessary. Fine-tuning involves training the model on custom datasets or specific domains to improve its performance for specialized tasks. OpenAI provides guidance on the fine-tuning process to optimize model outputs.
  5. Bias Mitigation: Addressing biases is important when generating content. Evaluate the prompts and outputs for any unintended biases and make adjustments as necessary. OpenAI provides guidelines on handling bias and avoiding biased behavior in AI models.
  6. Error Handling and Post-Processing: AI models may produce outputs with grammatical or logical errors. Implement error handling and post-processing techniques to improve the quality of the generated content. This may involve grammar correction, removing irrelevant or incorrect information, or ensuring logical coherence.

Developers, don’t be weary of generative AI at all! 

We’re saying it again! Generative AI and software development are meant to complement and not replace each other. You need to understand that AI can perform a certain set of functions. But this performance is still limited to the data that is made available to it. AI will require constant enhancements which will require human intervention, and even then, there will be some complex tasks that only humans can perform. 

Let’s take an example of the calculator. When the calculator was invented, it didn’t replace expert mathematicians. In fact, it aided them to make more advancements in the field. In other words, it’s up to the user how to use technology.

You don’t have to fear AI, you have to use it for your own good. Keep improving your tech stack by adding skills that are required by the AI industry. There are plenty of AI-related opportunities waiting for you out there.

Are you a software developer looking for a remote AI job? Sign up on Turing today and work with top US companies. But that’s not all. Enjoy high salaries, flexible working hours, stellar career growth, and much more. Head over to the Apply for Jobs page now.


FAQs

  1. Is ChatGPT 4 better than 3?
    While GPT-4 showcases enhanced contextual understanding, increased parameter count, specialization in domains, and improved quality control, it is expected to outperform GPT-3 by generating more coherent, accurate, and domain-specific responses, making it a more advanced language model.
  2. Is ChatGPT 4 free to use?
    Open AI’s ChatGPT 4 is not available to free users. You will have to subscribe to the ChatGPT Plus subscription in order to access GPT4. 
  3. Is Chat GPT-4 going to replace developers?
    As said earlier, no version of AI can fully replace developers. AI, to be specific, Chat GPT4 is there to enhance the productivity of the developers and automate some of the basic programming. Other than that, AI will still require human interaction in order to write complex programming. 
  4. Will generative AI replace programmers?
    No, generative AI is not here to replace programmers but to help them enhance their productivity. Generative AI can help automate basic programming codes that help developers to minimize their turnaround time.
  5. What are the skills required to become a prompt engineer?
    Key skills required to become a prompt engineer are expertise in Natural Language Processing (NLP), programming and scripting, data analysis and evaluation, domain expertise, creativity and problem-solving, communication and collaboration, and adaptability.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 6, 2023
Cross-platform vs. Native Mobile Development
Software Comparisons

Cross-platform vs Native Mobile Development: What Should Enterprises Choose?

Everything you need to know about cross-platform vs. native mobile development for enterprises: what each one means, their pros and cons, tools, and more.

There was a time when enterprises only focused on their products to achieve success. However, the technology age has pushed businesses to align with the latest software development trends as well, like cloud computing, AI, AR/VR, the Internet of Things (IoT), automation, and more. Enterprise mobile apps are designed to help companies do just that, allowing them to enhance corporate efficiency, capture market opportunities, and gain a competitive advantage. 

However, to build successful mobile apps, enterprises must consider cross-platform vs. native mobile development: which is better, and why? In this blog, we’ll answer these questions by discussing what the two mean, how native vs. cross-platform app development compares in terms of pros and cons, and what you must keep in mind when choosing between the two. 

Let’s dive in!

Native vs. cross-platform: How to choose for enterprise mobile apps development? 

Given the many benefits of enterprise mobile app development, it’s only natural that businesses are increasingly adopting it. Those who are must ultimately decide which one to opt for – native or cross-platform mobile development

Native and cross-platform development are fundamentally different in the operating system you want your app to function for. Native mobile apps are built for a specific operating system, such as iOS or Android. Whereas cross-platform apps work on multiple operating systems, allowing businesses to target several platforms through a single source code.

Having said that, choosing cross-platform vs. native mobile development is imperative to business success. To help you decide what’s best for your organization, we’ll explore the two development processes, what they entail, and their pros and cons. 

Also, read: Progressive Web Apps vs Native Apps: What Should You Pick?

Native app development 

Let’s take a look at the basics of native app development.

What are native applications?

As mentioned earlier, native mobile applications are those developed to target a single operating system, either iOS or Android OS. Hence, depending on your desired operating system (both business and customer-wise), you would opt for native mobile app development that involves coding the application in the OS’s required programming language. 

Native Android apps are built using Kotlin or Java programming languages. For native iOS applications, developers commonly use Swift or Objective-C programming languages.

Some of the most popular examples of native mobile apps include WhatsApp, Spotify, Google Maps, and Pinterest, which were developed natively for iOS and Android.

Popular native app tools

Besides OS-specific software development kits (SDK), native app development also requires integrated development environments (IDE). For Android, the most prominent IDEs include Android Studio, Visual Studio Code (VS Code), JetBrains IntelliJ IDEA, and Eclipse with Android Development Tools (ADT). Popular IDEs for iOS include Xcode, Flutter, Visual Studio for Mac, and AppCode. 

Why choose native mobile app development for enterprises?

Why choose native mobile app development for enterprises

Why choose native mobile app development for enterprises

When considering cross-platform vs native mobile development, here are the benefits you can avail by opting for a native app.

  • Better app performance: Native mobile apps perform faster and better than most non-native and cross-platform applications. This is because native enterprise mobile apps are created and optimized for specific platforms, which also involves compiling them using the desired platform’s APIs and programming languages. As a result, native mobile apps are quite efficient, fast, and responsive to a user’s actions.

    Furthermore, a native mobile app is smaller in size and has direct contact between its source code and the underlying resources. Hence, the native app provides better performance and faster app store downloads. 

  • Better app stability: Apple and Google are known for their continued support and improvement for the iOS and Android mobile operating systems. For instance, both tech giants offer SDKs, interface elements, and other key development tools for iOS and Android developers to create and enhance mobile apps.

    SDK helps speed up app development and provides developers with access to the latest features. Due to this, a native Android or iOS app has high stability in terms of updates and maintenance. Plus, native apps are highly secure as they can access platform-specific in-built security features, which is a major aspect to keep in mind when considering a native app vs. cross-platform mobile applications.

  • Excellent user experience: Native enterprise mobile apps offer a seamless user experience. During native mobile app development, developers don’t need to worry about any dependency on the app version from various operating systems. As a result, a native mobile app is faster and simpler to customize or configure as per the enterprise’s preferred OS and business goals.

    Moreover, a native mobile app can access all the functionalities and features of the intended device, offering a highly-integrated and rich user experience. Native mobile apps can gain access to features like push notifications as well, which are essential for user engagement.

  • Enhanced app security: App security is another important factor to consider when discussing cross-platform vs. native mobile development. Native mobile apps inherently contain more robust and tailored security features than cross-platform apps. Plus, it’s typically simpler for native mobile app developers to implement intelligent fraud detection, file encryption, and other security elements through the intended platform’s resources and libraries. 

Disadvantages of native app development

Disadvantages of native app development

Disadvantages of native app development

While a native app is beneficial, it also comes with its drawbacks, which are the following:

  • Time-consuming and costly: If your enterprise wants to target both iOS and Android users, the development will inevitably become costly. You would need to deploy two development teams to create the same app for both operating systems.

    Plus, the two teams working in parallel and coordinating to align the app UI/UX will automatically lengthen the development cycle. As such, the development time becomes a crucial deciding factor for cross-platform vs. native mobile development, and enterprises often pick the former for faster deployment.

  • No code reusability: Building a native mobile app for two operating systems means developers have to write code that cannot be reused from one OS onto another. When compared with cross-platform apps that house reusable codebases, native enterprise mobile app development naturally involves more time, money, and effort.

  • Extra effort for app maintenance and support: While considering cross-platform vs. native mobile development, factoring in costs is essential. As such, enterprises must note that native app development entails a higher maintenance expense.

    Most businesses make the mistake of believing that application costs end after its release. However, a chunk of effort goes into the app’s maintenance and support phase, which also slows down bug fixes. If the development team identifies a bug and wants to push out an important update, updating the same app for both platforms will be more time and resource intensive.

Cross-platform app development

Here’s what you need to know about cross-platform app development. 

What are cross-platform applications? 

A cross-platform mobile application is developed from a single codebase and targets different operating systems through one development project. Such mobile apps are built on cross-platform frameworks that use a platform-specific SDK (iOS or Android) from a single API.

This helps developers easily access the platform’s various libraries and SDKs, making cross-platform development a popular choice for enterprise mobile app development.

Some of the most popular cross-platform frameworks include: 

  • React Native – created by Meta (formerly, Facebook), has JavaScript as its programming language
  • .NET MAUI – created by Microsoft, has XAML and C# as its programming language
  • Flutter – created by Google, has Dart as its programming language

There are various cross-platform mobile apps prominent today, based on these frameworks. The most common examples of such apps include Skype, Instagram, My BMW App, Airbnb, Fox Sports, and Walmart.

Popular cross-platform app tools

Creating a cross-platform mobile app for Android requires the Android SDK installed on macOS, Windows, or Linux. For iOS, the iOS SDK and Xcode are required, along with a macOS device.

Along with these, the relevant IDEs are essential for successful cross-platform development, which are: 

  • VS Code, Xcode, Atom, Android Studio, and WebStorm for React Native apps
  • Visual Studio for Xamarin or .NET MAUI apps
  • Android Studio, IntelliJ, and VS Code for Flutter apps

Why choose cross-platform development?

Why choose cross-platform development

Why choose cross-platform development

When considering cross-platform or native mobile development, there are many reasons to pick the former. Some key ones include:

  • Code reusability: One of the biggest reasons to choose cross-platform development for enterprise mobile apps is code reusability. Unlike native app development, developers can store the app’s complete codebase in one place to save time and effort. The unified codebase allows the development team to work on the Android and iOS platforms simultaneously, which ultimately saves expenses.

    What’s more, the shared codebase helps to avoid app issues in the UI/UX, security, or functionalities due to longer maintenance cycles. The shared codebase allows developers to make changes that instantly propagate to the required operating systems with little to no modification. 

  • Quicker development time: Since cross-platform apps involve a single development cycle to deploy them on different platforms, the overall development time is faster. Moreover, the app’s code reusability allows enterprises to eliminate the need for separate teams working on separate platform projects, which expedites the time-to-market as well.

  • Decreased development costs: As mentioned earlier, considering expenses for cross-platform vs. native mobile development is important. In this case, cross-platform is often the better choice as it entails a single development team instead of two, which automatically reduces development costs.

    Plus, for enterprises using tools like React Native to create both mobile and web apps, developers can use a majority of the code and other key assets to do so. This shortens the cross-platform development cycle, resulting in reduced costs and more importantly, higher value for money as the app begins gaining traction.

  • Wide market reach and easy maintenance: Since cross-platform development is faster and cheaper, enterprises can easily deploy an app on both operating systems. This is lucrative for businesses aiming to reach more users and collect data to test a prototype, hypothesis, or app idea on multiple platforms.

    Moreover, updating the cross-platform app is easier as developers have to deal with one codebase. This means, whatever changes or updates need to be made after obtaining user data can be easily implemented to ensure quick maintenance. Plus, every app build targeting the two operating systems will use the same code, allowing developers to maintain app consistency.

    These are extremely beneficial for growing businesses, making cross-platform a clear winner for most enterprises considering cross-platform vs. native mobile development.

Disadvantages of cross-platform development

Disadvantages of cross-platform development

Disadvantages of cross-platform development

While cross-platform development is rewarding, you must be aware of its limitations as well. These include: 

  • Lower app performance: One of the biggest drawbacks of cross-platform mobile apps is their low performance and speed. Cross-platform apps need a rendering process and an additional abstraction layer, which reduces their speed and also hampers performance.

    Moreover, a cross-platform framework bundles custom runtimes to run the mobile app for communication with the platform-specific services. This adds another computation level to the app, further reducing its performance. Hence, enterprises wanting to deploy high-performant apps often pick the latter of cross-platform vs. native mobile development.

  • Functionality constraints: Cross-platform mobile apps must adapt their functionality and design for specific devices, platforms, and operating systems. This requires extra effort from the mobile app development team to tackle individual differences for various platforms and devices, causing difficulty during feature implementation and resulting in constrained functionality.

    This, combined with the lower app speed and performance, ultimately hampers the user experience as well. 

  • Delayed updates and features: Another aspect most companies overlook when considering cross-platform vs. native mobile development is the app updates. Whenever Apple or Google releases a new update or feature for their OS, cross-platform mobile apps have to wait to support the new release. This is because a cross-platform app would require a separate update to access the latest features or updates, while the SDK for a native app gets updated quicker. 

Cross-platform vs. native mobile development: What should enterprises choose?

Cross-platform vs. native mobile development: What should enterprises choose

Cross-platform vs. native mobile development: What should enterprises choose?

As you may have understood by now, both native and cross-platform development have their distinct pros and cons for deploying enterprise mobile apps. So, which one should you pick for your business? 

Deciding between native vs. cross-platform is crucial, and to pick the right one, you need to consider a few key factors. These include: 

  • Time to market: One of the biggest deciding factors when considering cross-platform vs. native mobile development is the time to market. While cross-platform entails quicker development and iteration, native app development is more time-consuming, albeit providing a more consistent user experience.

    So, if your business needs to deploy the app quickly to start obtaining quality user feedback, cross-platform development would be the better option. 

  • Testing feasibility: Your enterprise mobile app development process will remain incomplete without a proper testing round. Deciding between native and cross-platform development plays a crucial role here too, as native apps are more challenging to test as they involve individual testing for different app versions of the different operating systems. Contrarily, cross-platform apps are easier to test due to their single codebase.

    If you have the time and resources to invest in a proper native app testing phase, you can go ahead with it. However, if you lack the resources and want to quickly ship the product, opt for cross-platform development. 

  • Development budget: As evident already, cross-platform is a more cost-efficient option than native mobile app development. The latter involves deploying two standalone apps when targeting both operating systems, which would require hiring more developers, investing more resources, and ultimately, spending more money.

    So, if you’re on a tight budget and the limitations don’t seem too problematic, choose cross-platform development. However, if you have the budget and want to prioritize user experience and app updates, native app development should be your choice.

  • App performance: How you want your app to perform will also influence the choice between cross-platform vs. native mobile development. Mobile applications often entail high computing requirements, specifically for gaming apps. If your enterprise needs an application with accelerated performance and seamless user experience, a native app is the best fit.

    However, if that’s not your enterprise goal and you’d rather leverage a wider audience reach and quicker time-to-market, opt for a cross-platform mobile app.

  • Security: When considering native vs. cross-platform for your enterprise mobile app development, you must emphasize security too. Security is critical, especially for apps that store and manage large amounts of data, such as a banking mobile app. In such cases, a native app is better as they have tighter security due to being built in the OS-specific environment. Native app development also entails access to native libraries, allowing developers to ensure app encryption.

    However, if you want to prioritize maintenance, a cross-platform mobile app would be the better fit. As mentioned earlier, cross-platform app development involves easier maintenance due to the shared codebase. Moreover, since you’ll be dealing with just one app instead of two standalone ones, maintenance costs will be lower too. 

Summing things up

KBV Research’s data suggests that the overall enterprise app market size will reach $468.2 billion by 2027. Within this sphere, the mobile enterprise app market is projected to grow at 15% CAGR from 2022 to 2030, reaching $268.14 billion by 2030. Clearly, enterprise mobile apps are rapidly gaining popularity, but to build them efficiently, you must choose wisely when considering cross-platform vs. native mobile development.

Although both native and cross-platform development can help you build a successful app, you must consider the tools, frameworks, benefits, and limitations of the two to ensure efficient development. Moreover, understanding the in and out of both development paths will help you determine which mobile developers you must hire, and allocate resources accordingly. 

Turing’s mobile app development services are designed to help enterprises achieve rapid business transformation. As such, we provide expert mobile app developers proficient in the required technologies to ensure application success and accelerated business growth. Book a call with us today and experience what a robust enterprise mobile app can do for you.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Jul 25, 2023
PHP vs ASP.NET
Software Comparisons

PHP vs ASP.NET: Which is Better?

PHP vs ASP.NET: PHP is a server-side scripting language used for web development. ASP.NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building dynamic web apps.

The PHP vs ASP.NET battle has intrigued developers for years. As you know, PHP and ASP.NET are popular technologies for building dynamic web apps. Each technology has its own strengths and caters to different types of software projects. While PHP is a server-side scripting language used for web development, ASP.NET is a framework developed by Microsoft for building dynamic web apps.

This blog post compares PHP and ASP.NET across several parameters like performance, scalability, frameworks, libraries, cost, database integration, and ORM to help you make the best choice for your project. Keep reading to know more.

Table of Contents:

  1. What is PHP?
  2. What is ASP.NET?
  3. PHP vs ASP.NET: Performance and scalability 
  4. PHP vs ASP.NET: Frameworks and libraries
  5. PHP vs ASP.NET: Cost Comparison
  6. PHP vs ASP.NET: Database Integration and ORM
  7. PHP vs ASP.NET: Security and Vulnerability
  8. PHP vs ASP.NET: Language Syntax and Development Environment
  9. PHP pros and cons
  10. ASP.NET pros and cons
  11. Bottom Line
  12. PHP vs ASP.NET: Which is better for a job?
  13. FAQs

What is PHP?

PHP (Hypertext Preprocessor) is an open-source scripting language that’s great for web development. PHP is generally used for building web servers. Rasmus Lerdorf, a Danish-Canadian programmer, built PHP in 1994. 

PHP stands out from other in-demand programming languages because it can be embedded into HTML code, which simplifies the creation of dynamic web pages.  But that’s not all. PHP is known for its simplicity and ease of use, and so, it is a popular choice for beginners. The language is also highly flexible and supports a wide range of databases. These features make it suitable for a range of web development projects. 

What’s more, PHP has a large community. In other words, there are plenty of resources, libraries, and frameworks out there to help you speed up your development process.

What is ASP.NET?

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side framework developed by Microsoft for building dynamic websites, web applications, and services. ASP stands for Active Server Pages Network Enabled Technologies. ASP.NET is built with the CLR (Common Language Runtime), as it allows programmers to write ASP code using any .NET language.

ASP.NET is known for its robustness and efficiency, and so, it is a great choice for enterprise-level applications. The framework offers several features that simplify web development, such as easy form submission, built-in security mechanisms, and state management. A notable feature of ASP.NET is that it can notify errors before compilation and has built-in caching features. 

As it is a Microsoft product, ASP.NET integrates well with other Microsoft technologies, and it’s backed by professional support. 

PHP vs ASP.NET: Performance and scalability comparison

PHP vs ASP.NET: Performance and scalability comparison

PHP vs ASP.NET: Performance and scalability comparison

To compare PHP vs ASP.NET on the basis of performance, we will have to factor in speed, memory usage, and response time. Both PHP and ASP.NET have their own runtime environments and optimizations that can affect performance.

  • PHP is known for its lightweight nature and fast execution speed, especially when coupled with opcode caching mechanisms.
  • ASP.NET offers performance optimization features such as just-in-time (JIT) compilation and server-side caching, which can enhance application performance.
  • Scalability refers to a system’s ability to handle increasing workloads and growing demands without performance degradation.
  • PHP and ASP.NET both have the capacity to scale, but ASP.NET’s scalability capabilities are often attributed to its integration with Microsoft technologies like Windows Server, IIS, and SQL Server.
  • Factors such as implementation, coding practices, and hardware infrastructure can impact the performance and scalability of both PHP and ASP.NET applications.
  • Conducting performance testing and optimization specific to your project’s requirements is crucial for achieving optimal performance and scalability.

Also, read: Popular SQL Certifications for Your Data Career in 2023 

PHP’s lightweight nature and fast execution, along with ASP.NET’s performance optimization features, contribute to their respective performance advantages. Both PHP and ASP.NET have scalability capabilities, with ASP.NET benefitting from its integration with Microsoft technologies. Careful consideration and testing are essential to ensure optimal performance and scalability in your web development projects using PHP or ASP.NET.

PHP vs ASP.NET: Frameworks and libraries

PHP vs ASP.NET: Frameworks and libraries

PHP vs ASP.NET: Frameworks and libraries

Frameworks and libraries play a crucial role in web development as they provide pre-built components, tools, and structures to expedite the development process and enhance code organization. 

  • PHP has frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, CodeIgniter, and Yii, offering features for web application development.
  • ASP.NET provides frameworks like ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Core, following the MVC pattern.

Also, read: MVC vs. Flux vs. Redux: What Should You Pick?

  • PHP has a vibrant library ecosystem, including Guzzle for HTTP requests and PHPUnit for testing.
  • ASP.NET benefits from libraries like Entity Framework for ORM and SignalR for real-time communication.

Both PHP and ASP.NET benefit from a vast selection of libraries that can be integrated into projects to extend their functionality. PHP has a vibrant community-driven ecosystem with libraries like Guzzle for HTTP requests, Twig for templating, and PHPUnit for testing. Similarly, ASP.NET benefits from libraries like Entity Framework for object-relational mapping (ORM), SignalR for real-time communication, and AutoMapper for object-object mapping.

Consider factors like community support, documentation, and integration ease when choosing a framework or library. PHP’s lightweight nature and fast execution, along with frameworks like Laravel, provide performance advantages. ASP.NET’s features, like JIT compilation and caching, contribute to its performance. Both PHP and ASP.NET offer frameworks and libraries, with PHP having a diverse ecosystem and ASP.NET providing options like MVC and Core. Consider community support and integration ease when selecting a framework or library for your project.

PHP vs ASP.NET: Cost comparison

PHP vs ASP.NET: Cost Comparison

PHP vs ASP.NET: Cost comparison

When evaluating programming languages and frameworks for web development, cost considerations are an important factor to take into account. Let’s explore the cost implications associated with PHP and ASP.NET development.

  • PHP, being open-source, is cost-effective with no licensing fees.
  • PHP benefits from a large community and free resources.
  • PHP can be deployed on various free or low-cost web servers.
  • ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft, may involve licensing costs for Windows Server and Microsoft IIS.
  • ASP.NET offers enterprise-level features and integrations with Microsoft technologies.
  • ASP.NET development may require specialized knowledge and experienced developers, potentially increasing costs.
  • PHP has a larger talent pool, making it easier to find developers at various price points.
  • Hiring ASP.NET developers may involve higher costs due to the demand and expertise required.

Consider project requirements, budget, and long-term goals when evaluating cost-effectiveness.

PHP generally provides a more cost-effective solution, while ASP.NET offers added value within the Microsoft ecosystem.

PHP’s open-source nature, lack of licensing fees, and larger talent pool contribute to its cost-effectiveness. ASP.NET, with potential licensing costs and demand for specialized developers, offers enterprise-level features and integration possibilities within the Microsoft ecosystem. Evaluating specific project requirements and long-term goals will help determine the most suitable and cost-effective option between PHP and ASP.NET.

PHP vs ASP.NET: Database integration and ORM

PHP vs ASP.NET: Database integration and ORM

PHP vs ASP.NET: Database integration and ORM

Database integration and ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) are crucial aspects of web development, as they facilitate the interaction between the application and the underlying database. 

  • PHP provides various options for database integration, including native extensions like MySQLi and PDO (PHP Data Objects).
  • PHP frameworks like Laravel offer built-in ORM functionality, such as Eloquent, allowing developers to work with databases using object-oriented techniques.
  • ASP.NET offers Entity Framework, a powerful ORM tool that simplifies database interactions by mapping database entities to object models.
  • Entity Framework supports multiple database providers, including Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL, MySQL, and more.
  • ASP.NET also provides LINQ (Language-Integrated Query), a feature that allows developers to query databases using a familiar syntax within their code.

Both PHP and ASP.NET support standard SQL queries for direct database interaction when needed. Consider factors like database preference, ORM requirements, and available tooling when choosing between PHP and ASP.NET for database integration and ORM.

Also, read: Best VS Code Shortcuts and Productivity Hacks for 2023 

PHP provides database integration options like MySQLi and PDO, along with ORM capabilities offered by frameworks like Laravel. ASP.NET offers Entity Framework as a powerful ORM tool and supports multiple database providers. Consider your specific database needs and preferences when evaluating the database integration and ORM features of PHP and ASP.NET.

Also, read: CakePHP vs Laravel: Here’s What You Should Know about These Popular PHP Frameworks 

PHP vs ASP.NET: Security and vulnerability

PHP vs ASP.NET: Security and vulnerability

PHP vs ASP.NET: Security and vulnerability

Security is a critical aspect of web development, and understanding the security features and vulnerabilities of programming languages and frameworks is essential. 

  • PHP has a strong focus on security, with regular updates and patches addressing identified vulnerabilities.
  • PHP provides various built-in security features, such as input validation functions and output encoding mechanisms, to mitigate common security risks like cross-site scripting (XSS) and SQL injection. However, PHP’s flexibility and ease of use can lead to vulnerabilities if not used correctly, making secure coding practices crucial.
  • ASP.NET, backed by Microsoft, emphasizes security and incorporates numerous security features.
  • ASP.NET provides protection against common vulnerabilities like XSS and CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) through built-in request validation and anti-forgery token mechanisms.
  • Additionally, ASP.NET benefits from Microsoft’s Security Development Lifecycle (SDL), ensuring regular security updates and adherence to best practices.
  • Both PHP and ASP.NET offer security guidelines and resources to assist developers in implementing secure coding practices.

It’s important for developers to stay updated on the latest security practices, follow secure coding guidelines, and conduct regular security audits to mitigate potential vulnerabilities. PHP and ASP.NET prioritize security and offer built-in features to mitigate common vulnerabilities. PHP’s flexibility requires developers to follow secure coding practices diligently. ASP.NET, backed by Microsoft, provides robust security features and benefits from regular updates and best practices. Adhering to secure coding practices and staying informed about the latest security measures is crucial for developing secure applications using PHP or ASP.NET.

PHP vs ASP.NET: Language syntax and development environment

PHP vs ASP.NET: Language syntax and development environment

PHP vs ASP.NET: Language syntax and development environment

The syntax of a programming language and the development environment can significantly impact the coding experience and productivity.

  • PHP uses a syntax similar to C and Perl, making it relatively easy for developers familiar with these languages to transition to PHP. It features simple and readable syntax, allowing developers to write code quickly and efficiently.
  • PHP is a server-side scripting language that is embedded within HTML. This integration enables developers to mix PHP code with HTML seamlessly, simplifying web development tasks.
  • PHP is primarily executed on web servers, and developers can run PHP code on various web servers like Apache, Nginx, or Microsoft IIS.
  • ASP.NET, on the other hand, uses a syntax similar to C#, a modern, object-oriented programming language. It offers a strongly typed and expressive syntax, facilitating robust and maintainable code.
  • ASP.NET is a web application framework that allows developers to build dynamic websites and web applications. It provides a comprehensive development environment, including Visual Studio, a powerful Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with features like code debugging, IntelliSense, and project management tools.
  • Visual Studio offers seamless integration with other Microsoft tools and technologies, providing a cohesive development experience for ASP.NET developers.
  • PHP has a range of Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) available, such as PhpStorm, Visual Studio Code, and Sublime Text, which offer features like code completion, debugging, and syntax highlighting.
  • Both PHP and ASP.NET benefit from a variety of development tools, extensions, and plugins that enhance the coding experience and productivity.

PHP’s syntax is simple and readable, with easy integration within HTML, while ASP.NET uses a syntax similar to C# and offers a comprehensive development environment with Visual Studio. Developers can choose from various IDEs and tools to work with both PHP and ASP.NET, ensuring an efficient and productive coding experience.

PHP Pros and cons

PHP Pros and Cons

PHP Pros and Cons

Pros of PHP

  • Easy to Learn and Use: PHP has a relatively gentle learning curve, making it accessible to beginners. It has a syntax similar to C and is widely documented, with numerous online resources and communities for support.
  • Large Developer Community: PHP has a vast and active developer community, which means there are extensive libraries, frameworks, and resources available. This community support can help developers solve problems and accelerate development.
  • Platform Independence: PHP is platform-independent, meaning it can run on various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and Unix. It also supports multiple web servers, such as Apache, Nginx, and Microsoft IIS.
  • Database Integration: PHP has built-in support for a wide range of databases, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, and SQLite. This makes it convenient for interacting with databases and developing database-driven applications.

Cons of PHP

  • Inconsistent Standard Library: PHP’s standard library can be inconsistent in terms of naming conventions, function parameters, and overall design. This inconsistency can make it challenging for developers to maintain code consistency and may require additional effort to ensure code quality.
  • Potential Security Vulnerabilities: PHP’s popularity has made it a target for security attacks. Writing secure PHP code requires strict adherence to security practices, such as input validation, output encoding, and proper handling of user data, to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  • Performance: While PHP has improved its performance over the years, it may not be as fast as some other programming languages. However, with proper optimization techniques, caching mechanisms, and efficient coding practices, performance concerns can be mitigated.
  • Scalability: PHP’s scalability can be a concern for handling large-scale applications with high traffic. While there are solutions like load balancing and caching mechanisms, scaling PHP applications may require additional architectural considerations and infrastructure resources.

ASP.NET Pros and cons

ASP.NET Pros and Cons

ASP.NET Pros and Cons

Pros of ASP.NET

  • Robust Framework: ASP.NET provides a robust and comprehensive framework for building web applications. It offers a wide range of features, tools, and libraries that aid in rapid development and makes it easier to create complex applications.
  • Seamless Integration with Microsoft Technologies: ASP.NET integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft technologies such as Windows servers, SQL Server, and Active Directory. This allows for smooth interoperability and leveraging of the Microsoft ecosystem.
  • High Performance: ASP.NET is known for its high performance and scalability. It is optimized for handling large-scale applications and can efficiently handle high traffic loads. It also offers features like caching and session management to further enhance performance.
  • Strong Security Features: ASP.NET has built-in security mechanisms and features to protect applications from common web vulnerabilities. It provides robust authentication and authorization mechanisms, input validation, and protection against cross-site scripting (XSS) and cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.

Cons of ASP.NET

  • Learning Curve: ASP.NET can have a steeper learning curve compared to some other web development frameworks. It requires a good understanding of the .NET framework and its concepts. However, with proper learning resources and guidance, developers can quickly grasp the fundamentals.
  • Windows Server Dependency: ASP.NET applications typically run on Windows servers, which can be a limitation if you prefer a different server environment. Although efforts have been made to make ASP.NET cross-platform with the introduction of .NET Core, it may still require additional configuration and setup.
  • Cost: Some versions of ASP.NET, such as the enterprise-level editions, can be costly. However, there are also free versions available, such as the open-source ASP.NET Core, which reduces licensing expenses.
  • Vendor Lock-In: Since ASP.NET is a Microsoft technology, it can lead to vendor lock-in. This means that migrating an application to a different platform or technology stack may require more effort and resources.

Bottom line

In summary, PHP and ASP.NET are popular because they offer powerful features for web development. PHP is appreciated for its simplicity and flexibility, making it a good choice for a wide range of web applications. As a scripting language, PHP is best suited for server-side programming.

ASP.NET, on the other hand, is known for its robustness and efficiency, making it suitable for building large-scale, enterprise-level applications. As a server-side web application framework, ASP.NET is ideal for creating web services, web resources, and APIs.

PHP vs ASP.NET: Which is better for a job?

Absolutely! Both PHP and ASP.NET developers are in good demand! Both PHP and ASP.NET are popular in the web development industry, and developers with skills in these languages can find excellent job opportunities in various organizations and sectors that rely on web application development.

Are you a software developer looking for remote PHP jobs

Or are you looking for remote ASP.NET jobs instead?  

We’ve got you covered. Top US companies are waiting to hire PHP and ASP.NET developers like you. Sign up on Turing today. For more information, visit the Apply for Jobs page.


FAQs

  1. Which is the best, PHP or ASP.NET?
    PHP is perfect for small and medium-scale enterprises, while ASP.NET is ideal for large-scale companies.

  2. Which is faster, ASP.NET or PHP?
    ASP.NET performs comparatively faster than PHP; because compiled languages are usually faster than interpreted languages.

  3. Which is easier to learn: ASP.NET or PHP?
    ASP.NET has a steep learning curve and is, overall, difficult to master. On the other hand, PHP is simpler and easier to learn and apply. 

  4. When to use PHP?
    PHP is used for server-side programming, dynamic content generation, and database interaction, making it suitable for web development. ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft, is ideal for building robust, scalable web applications, especially when integrating with Microsoft technologies like Windows servers, SQL Server, and Active Directory. It offers features for enterprise-level applications, including built-in security, data access through Entity Framework, and support for multi-tier architecture.

  5. When to use ASP.NET?
    ASP.NET is a powerful framework for building secure and scalable web applications, particularly when integrating with Microsoft technologies like Windows servers, SQL Server, and Active Directory. It provides enterprise-level features such as built-in security, seamless data access through Entity Framework, and support for multi-tier architecture. ASP.NET offers options like Web Forms for rapid development and MVC for structured and testable applications, making it a versatile choice for various web development needs.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Jul 19, 2023
Angular Material vs Bootstrap A Detailed Comparison (1)
Software Comparisons

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: A Detailed Comparison

Angular Material vs Bootstrap, what should you choose as your front-end library? Here’s a detailed comparison between the two. Angular Material is a component.

Great websites have excellent user interfaces and offer a user experience of the highest quality. Front-end tools like Angular Material and Bootstrap are necessary to create a high-functioning and responsive website. So, which is better in the Angular Material vs Bootstrap battle? Can I use Bootstrap for Angular? Is Angular Material good for mobile applications? This blog post will help you answer all these questions. Keep reading.

Table of Contents:

  1. What is Angular Material?
  2. What is Bootstrap?
  3. What is the difference between Angular and Angular Material?
  4. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Can these two be used together?
  5. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Let’s compare the two 
  6. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Practical use cases comparison
  7. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which one to choose on the basis of performance and speed?
  8. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which one is better for accessibility and internationalization?
  9. Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which is better? 
  10. FAQs

What is Angular Material?

Angular Material is a user interface module that offers pre-built component collections for frameworks like Vue.js, Angular, and React among others. The Angular Material component library offers components like input sliders, checkboxes, toolbar, site navigation patterns, buttons, and data tables to make responsive websites and applications.

What is Bootstrap?

Bootstrap is an intuitive and open-source CSS framework that helps build attractive web pages and mobile applications. CSS frameworks consist of several ready-to-use stylesheets by web developers. Bootstrap offers an array of HTML and CSS designs and pre-styled components like dropdowns, badges alert, progress bars, and navigation patterns.

What is the difference between Angular and Angular Material?

AngularJS is a JavaScript framework, whereas Angular Material is a User Interface module. Google introduced a design language called Material in 2014 which was later affixed to Angular JS. In 2016, Google built Angular’s code from scratch using Typescript and integrated the design language Material as Angular Material.

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Can these two be used together?

Can I use Angular Material and Bootstrap together?

Yes, you can use parts of Angular Material and Bootstrap together in the same web or mobile project. Developers need to be careful not to use the same components, which can clash.

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Let’s compare the two 

Angular Material vs Bootstrap (2)

Angular Material vs Bootstrap

  1. Unique components

    Angular Material and Bootstrap offer a variety of unique components for great website design. The unique components of Angular Material are not found in Bootstrap and vice-versa.

    Angular Material offers unique components like a date picker, slider, grid list, toolbar, icon, snack bar, progress spinner, chips, stepper, and sort header.

    On the other hand, Bootstrap offers unique components like a carousel, collapse, scroll spy, breadcrumb, jumbotron, and popovers.
  2. Card

    In Angular Material and Bootstrap, a card is an entry point for varying items like photos, text, and links for UI design. The card serves as a container for different items related to a single subject.

    Bootstrap offers different color options, whereas Angular Material provides a plain card.
  3. Dialog or Modal

    Dialogs in Angular Material or Modals in Bootstrap refer to plugins that help users add information or choose from multiple options.

    In Angular Material, dialogs help edit present data to pass it to the dialog component. The dialog configuration object utilizes the data property to pass the data.

    Bootstrap uses modals that offer customizable, responsive pop-ups and lightboxes. Videos, alerts, images, and animations can be inside modals.
  4. Menu or Navbar

    Menu in Angular Material or Navbar in Bootstrap help builds effective navigation for your website or mobile application.

    Angular Material offers a menu that contains an extensive toolbar and an exceptional sidebar. Developers can attach the menu with different controls and utilize styling and animation options as required.

    Navbar in Bootstrap is a collapsible and extendable item that can do so as per the screen size. Developers who want to achieve responsive navigation can do so easily with Navbar.
  5. Expansion panel

    The expansion panel displays the content summary inside the panel. Developers can choose the content and design format of the panel.

    The Expansion Panel in Angular Material is according to the latest user interface design and presents a complete summary to users.

    In Bootstrap, the expansion panel is in a collapsible format that needs some CSS styling improvements to be in sync with the latest design.
  6. Application architecture

    Application architecture refers to the tools, patterns, and designs that help you build and design an application.

    Angular Material offers a layered architecture with all components attached to core functionalities. Developers can choose single components or bundle components together for their applications.

    Bootstrap architecture is a view-view-controller type as it uses two components namely the logic layer and the view layer. Developers can choose from the twelve components of the logic layer and the six modules of the view layer.  Also, Bootstrap supports the MVC architecture design pattern for web pages.
  7. Responsive-oriented approach

    In the responsive-oriented approach, the website design goes through dynamic changes as per the screen size and device orientation.

    Bootstrap supports a responsive-oriented approach, whereas Angular Material does not support a responsive design approach.

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Practical use cases comparison

Bootstrap and Angular Material are both powerful frameworks, each with its own strengths and ideal use cases. Understanding the practical scenarios where these frameworks excel can help remote software developers make informed decisions when choosing the right tool for their projects.

  1. E-commerce Platforms:

    When to use Bootstrap: Bootstrap’s large library of pre-built components and responsive grid structure make it a good choice for creating e-commerce platforms. Its ready-to-use UI elements, such as navigation menus, carousels, and forms, are simply customizable to meet the branding and design needs of online retailers.

    When to use Angular Material: Angular Material’s material design philosophy and pre-designed components provide a visually appealing and consistent user interface for e-commerce platforms. Its user interface components, including as cards, menus, and sliders, have a modern look and feel, which improves the user experience.
  2. Content Management Systems (CMS):

    When to use Bootstrap: Bootstrap’s flexibility and modular approach make it well-suited for developing content management systems. Its grid system allows developers to create responsive layouts that adapt to various screen sizes, providing an optimal viewing experience for managing and displaying content.

    When to use Angular Material: Angular Material’s clean and intuitive design language makes it an ideal choice for building content management systems interfaces. Its cohesive set of components, such as tables, forms, and dialog boxes, streamline the content management process and contribute to a seamless user experience.
  3. Data Visualization Tools:

    When to use Bootstrap: Bootstrap can be leveraged to create visually appealing and interactive data visualization tools. Its responsive grid system combined with custom CSS and JavaScript libraries, such as D3.js or Chart.js, allows developers to build dynamic charts, graphs, and dashboards that effectively communicate complex data.

    When to use Angular Material: Angular Material’s robust set of UI components, including charts and data tables, simplify the development of data visualization tools. With Angular Material, developers can easily incorporate interactive visualizations and data-driven components into their applications.
  4. Enterprise Applications:

    When to use Bootstrap: Bootstrap’s extensive community support and availability of themes make it a popular choice for developing enterprise applications. Its wide range of components and plugins, coupled with its responsive design, enable the creation of feature-rich and user-friendly interfaces for various enterprise needs, such as dashboards, CRM systems, or project management tools.

    When to use Angular Material: Angular Material’s modular architecture and consistent design language make it well-suited for building enterprise applications with complex workflows. Its comprehensive set of components, like data tables, form controls, and modals, provide a cohesive user experience and can be easily customized to meet specific business requirements.

By considering these practical use cases, remote software developers can evaluate whether Bootstrap or Angular Material is the more suitable framework for their particular project requirements. It is important to assess factors such as design flexibility, component ecosystem, performance, and community support when making the decision, ultimately ensuring the successful implementation of the chosen framework.

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which one to choose on the basis of performance and speed?

Angular Material vs Bootstrap (3)

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Performance and speed

Several aspects come into play when comparing the performance and loading time of Bootstrap vs Angular Material, which can affect the overall speed and efficiency of a website. Here are some essential factors to consider while comparing the performance of both frameworks:

  • File Size: The size of each framework’s CSS and JavaScript files can have a considerable impact on loading speeds. Bootstrap includes a large number of CSS and JavaScript files that span a wide variety of components and functionalities. Angular Material, on the other hand, takes a more modular approach, allowing developers to include only the components that are required, lowering total file size.
  • Network Requests: The number of network requests required to fetch CSS, JavaScript, and other assets affects the loading speed. Bootstrap typically requires separate requests for each CSS and JavaScript file, while Angular Material can be bundled and optimized using build tools like Angular CLI, resulting in fewer network requests.
  • Rendering Efficiency: The rendering efficiency of the frameworks can impact the time it takes to render the user interface and make it interactive. Angular Material is built specifically for Angular applications, leveraging the power of Angular’s change detection and optimization mechanisms, which can lead to efficient rendering. Bootstrap, being a more general-purpose framework, may not have the same level of optimization for rendering efficiency.
  • Caching: Browser caching can improve subsequent page loads by storing static assets locally. Both Bootstrap and Angular Material can take advantage of browser caching, allowing returning users to experience faster load times after the initial visit.

    Also, read Cache-Control Headers and Their Use Cases You Must Know! 
  • Minification and Compression: Minifying and compressing CSS and JavaScript files can significantly reduce their size, resulting in faster loading times. Both Bootstrap and Angular Material offer minified versions of their files, which should be used in production to optimize performance.

It’s important to note that the actual performance and loading speed of a web application built with Bootstrap or Angular Material depends on various factors, including the specific implementation, server configuration, network conditions, and the overall complexity of the application.

To determine which framework performs better in a specific scenario, it is recommended to conduct performance tests using tools like Lighthouse, PageSpeed Insights, or web browser developer tools. These tools can provide insights into metrics such as First Contentful Paint (FCP), Time to Interactive (TTI), and Total Blocking Time (TBT), giving a more accurate comparison of performance between Bootstrap and Angular Material.

Also, read: What Is Cross-Browser Compatibility Testing? What Are Its Best Practices? 

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which one is better for accessibility and internationalization?

Angular Material vs Bootstrap Accessibility and Internationalization comparison

Angular Material vs Bootstrap accessibility and Internationalization comparison

When comparing Bootstrap and Angular Material in terms of accessibility and internationalization, it’s essential to consider the features and support offered by each framework to create inclusive and globally accessible web applications. Here’s a comparison of both frameworks in these aspects:

Accessibility:

  • Accessibility Guidelines: Bootstrap follows the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 standards and strives to ensure its components are accessible. It provides appropriate ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles, attributes, and keyboard navigation support for interactive elements. However, the level of accessibility compliance may vary depending on how components are customized and implemented.
  • Angular Material Accessibility: Angular Material also aims to meet WCAG 2.0 standards and provides accessibility features out of the box. It includes ARIA support, keyboard navigation, and adheres to high contrast and color contrast standards. Angular Material components have built-in accessibility features, but developers should ensure proper usage and configuration.
  • Keyboard Navigation: Both frameworks support keyboard navigation for users who rely on assistive technologies or have motor disabilities. Bootstrap provides basic keyboard navigation for its components, while Angular Material emphasizes keyboard accessibility by incorporating focus management and intuitive navigation within components.
  • Customization and ARIA Attributes: Both frameworks allow customization of their components, which gives developers the flexibility to apply appropriate ARIA attributes and ensure proper accessibility. However, developers need to be mindful of maintaining accessibility standards while customizing components to avoid unintentionally introducing accessibility barriers.

Internationalization (i18n):

  • Internationalization Support: Angular Material has built-in support for internationalization (i18n) through Angular’s i18n features. It provides mechanisms for translating components, handling pluralization, and managing locale-specific formatting and date/time formatting. Angular’s i18n features allow developers to create multilingual applications easily.
  • Bootstrap and i18n: Bootstrap, being a CSS-based framework, does not have built-in i18n support. However, it can be used in conjunction with JavaScript-based i18n libraries or frameworks like Angular, React, or Vue.js to handle internationalization aspects.
  • Localization of Components: Angular Material offers localization support by providing translations for its components in different languages. This helps developers create applications that cater to users from different linguistic backgrounds without having to manually translate the components.
  • Right-to-Left (RTL) Support: Both Bootstrap and Angular Material offer RTL support, allowing developers to create applications for languages that are read from right to left. RTL support ensures proper layout and alignment of components, providing a seamless user experience for RTL language speakers.

It’s important to note that while both frameworks provide some level of accessibility and internationalization support, developers are responsible for implementing these features correctly. Adhering to best practices, including proper usage of ARIA attributes, semantic markup, focus management, and localization techniques, is crucial to ensure the highest level of accessibility and internationalization in web applications built with either Bootstrap or Angular Material.

Additionally, when aiming for accessibility and internationalization, it’s recommended to conduct thorough testing and consider involving users with disabilities and people from different cultural backgrounds to obtain feedback and ensure an inclusive user experience.

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: Which is better? 

As you know by now, Angular Material and Bootstrap are popular front-end frameworks for web application development. Angular Material is designed for use with Angular and follows Google’s Material Design principles. It offers pre-built UI components, theming, accessibility, and internationalization, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Bootstrap, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and provides a wide range of CSS and JavaScript components. It has a larger community, more flexibility for customization, and is suitable for various project sizes.

The choice between this Angular Material vs Bootstrap battle depends on the specific needs of the project. If you are developing an Angular application and prioritize adherence to Material Design principles, Angular Material would be the preferred choice. It provides a consistent and polished UI, along with extensive Angular integration. On the other hand, if you require a framework that is framework-agnostic and provides a larger community and more flexibility in terms of customization, Bootstrap would be a better fit.

Ultimately, the decision should be based on the project requirements, design preferences, and familiarity with the frameworks. Both Angular Material and Bootstrap have their strengths and can be excellent choices for different types of projects.

Are you an experienced Bootstrap or Angular Material developer looking for a job?

Try Turing!

Turing helps software developers land their dream remote jobs in top US companies with long-term career growth and unmatched compensation. Visit the Jobs page to know more!

Angular Material vs Bootstrap: FAQs

  1. Which applications use Bootstrap?
    Some of the popular applications that use Bootstrap are PayPal, WhatsApp, Lyft, Etsy, Apple maps connect, Upwork, and Duolingo among others.
  2. Which popular applications use Angular Material?
    Popular applications that use Angular Material are Gmail, Asana, Momondo, and Airbnb among others.
  3. Is Angular Material easy?
    Developers familiar with the Angular framework can easily utilize the components of Angular Material.
  4. Is Bootstrap like WordPress?
    Bootstrap is a front-end framework that helps with the user interface and website design. WordPress provides both front-end and back-end tools to create a website.
  5. What are some Bootstrap alternatives?
    Some of the Bootstrap alternatives are Tailwind CSS, Material-UI, Semantic UI, Foundation, Bulma, UIKit, etc.
  6. What are some Angular Material alternatives?
    Some Angular Material alternatives are PrimeNG, Clarity, NG-ZORRO, Onsen UI, etc. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By , Jun 7, 2023
Svelte vs React Which JavaScript Framework Is Better
Software Comparisons

Svelte vs React: Which JavaScript Framework Is Better?

Svelte vs React: Svelte is a front-end JavaScript compiler, simple and easy to use. React is a front-end JavaScript library that uses 3rd-party components.

Svelte vs React: What is Svelte used for? Is Svelte better than React? Why is Svelte so good? What makes Svelte different? Find answers to these questions, and more information, in the article below.

Svelte is a free and open-source front-end compiler based on JavaScript language. React is a front-end JavaScript library that uses multiple third-party components to design UI elements. The article explains the differences between Svelte vs React in detail. 

Developers use JavaScript frameworks like Svelte and React to create, design, and code functional websites. Knowing the difference between Svelte and React would help web developers decide which frameworks to choose.

Table of Contents

Svelte vs React: What is Svelte?

Developed by Rich Harris in 2016, Svelte is a free, open-source front-end compiler. Svelte compiles HTML templates to create unique code that manipulates the Document Object Model directly. Unlike traditional JavaScript frameworks like React, Svelte avoids overheads associated with the virtual DOM. 

The way Svelte operates reduces the transferred file size and offers better client performance. The compiler processes the application code inserts calls to automatically update the data, and re-renders UI elements affected by that data. Svelte is written in the TypeScript language, a superset of JavaScript. 

When should you use Svelte?

Svelte is known for simplicity, as its code closely resembles Vanilla JavaScript. Svelte allows developers to complete their objectives with fewer lines of code. Developers should use Svelte if they are targeting a very small package size for their website.

Programs written in Svelte are useful for application in low-capacity or low-power devices. Svelte tools and frameworks provide enhanced control over state management, routing, and building customized infrastructure. Svelte is useful for DOM manipulation, reactive frameworks, and emerging markets. 

Which companies use Svelte?

Major companies such as Yahoo, Rakuten, Bloomberg, Meta, Apple, The New York Times, Square, ByteDance, Spotify, Reuters, Ikea, Brave, and others rely on Svelte for their websites. Companies prefer Svelte because it converts the application’s code to ideal JavaScript while coding. Thus, framework abstractions do not hamper the performance of apps written in Svelte.

Svelte vs React: What is React?

Developers use React as a front-end JavaScript library to build user interfaces. The Meta (Facebook) maintains the UI components, and a community of developers and organizations work together to release improved versions. React is used as a base for developing websites, mobile applications, and server-rendered apps. 

React is useful for state management and for rendering that state onto the DOM. The development of React applications requires the usage of additional libraries. The knowledge of routing, client-side coding, and design patterns is a prerequisite for developing React components.

Also, read: Top 25 ReactJS Questions and Answers for 2023

When should you use React?

React is a flexible component library that is perfect for state management. Thus, websites and apps that use React components can exchange data without reloading the page. React should be used for user interfaces that require a lot of user interaction. 

React corresponds to ‘view’ in the model-view-controller. Thus, managing lower-level algorithms with React is easy, and coding is required only for the interface’s view model. React’s Virtual DOM improves website performance and reduces lags to enhance loading times. 

Which companies use React?

Highly successful organizations like Meta, Instagram, Salesforce, Shopify, Discord, Skype, and Pinterest use React to develop user interfaces. Due to the availability of a large number of developers globally, companies prefer React to create the front-end part of their websites. 

React is fast, easy to implement, and scalable, making it a popular choice among developers and organizations. 

Also, read: Why You Should Use ReactJS for Your Projects.

Svelte vs. React: Which is better? 

React and Svelte are both popular choices for building modern web applications. While they have similarities, they differ in key areas such as learning curve, performance, bundle size, state management, tooling and ecosystem, developer experience, and debugging

Developers may choose one of these frameworks over the other based on multiple factors and preferences. Let us compare their differences to help you choose the right JavaScript framework for your projects.

Difference between Svelte and React

Difference between Svelte and React

Learning curve

Let’s start with the Svelte vs React syntax differences first. React has a steep learning curve, especially for developers who are new to the world of front-end development. It requires a good understanding of JavaScript and the ability to work with complex state management. However, once developers are familiar with React, they can build complex UIs quickly and efficiently.

Svelte, on the other hand, has a relatively low learning curve. Its template language is easy to learn, and developers can quickly get up to speed with the framework. Svelte also has a small API surface, which means that there are fewer concepts to learn.

Performance

Traditional Document Object Model (DOM) triggers an update with each code change, which slows down the app’s performance. Virtual DOM speeds up the process by acting as temporary memory storage for changes made to the user interface. A process known as diffusion or reconciliation delays updates until updating and rendering can be carried out effectively.

React uses Virtual DOM to break down the app’s code when the code is executed. VDOM helps React perform faster than traditional JavaScript languages. But Svelte takes performance a bit further by ignoring the VDOM diffing process.

Svelte acts as a compiler that carries out DOM rendering through reactive programming. Whenever an assignment triggers a change in the component stage, the DOM is updated. Thus, as a serverless-first framework, Svelte is considered more reactive than React.

Bundle Size

Svelte’s .gzip version has a size of 1.6 kilobytes. On the other hand, React.gzip, when combined with ReactDOM, comes to a total size of 42.2 kilobytes. Svelte’s smaller bundle size ensures better loading speeds, better responsiveness, and reduced bandwidth costs. 

State management

The next point of comparison in the React vs Svelte battle is state management. React’s state management is based on a unidirectional data flow, where the state is passed down from parent components to child components. Now this approach can lead to complex code, especially when dealing with large and complex applications.

Svelte, on the other hand, uses a reactive approach to state management. This approach means that the UI automatically updates when the data changes, which makes it easier to manage the state of the application.

Testing

Code written in React can be tested with ‘end-to-end’ tests. React code of an application is tested in a realistic browser environment. This reduces your app’s time to market (TTM) and boosts its value. 

Svelte offers its testing library for unit testing. The Svelte testing library is smaller in size than React and offers simple computations. Thus, Svelte can help developers maintain clean, functional, and compressed code.

Also, read: 10 Popular Software Testing Trends in 2023

Tooling and ecosystem

Tooling and ecosystem are important factors to consider in the Svelte vs React battle. React has a large ecosystem of third-party tools and libraries, while Svelte’s ecosystem is still growing. However, Svelte’s small API surface and efficient compiler make it easier to use without the need for additional tools and libraries.

Developer experience

As you know, developer experience is important for productivity and maintaining code quality. React’s component-based architecture makes it easy to reuse code and build complex UIs quickly. Svelte’s template language and reactive programming approach make it easy to build UIs quickly and efficiently.

Community Support

React has a huge community of developers, as it is one of the most widely used JavaScript platforms in the world. The community of React developers creates tutorials, guides, updates, components, and more to maintain the usability of the JavaScript library.

The fact that a large-scale organization like Meta (Facebook) maintains React keeps React developers in high demand. 

Related Post: How to Hire React JS Developers?

Svelte is rather uncommon, but developers report high levels of satisfaction while using Svelte. The enterprise-level support for Svelte is fairly new, as Sveltekit 1.0 is yet to be released. The Svelte community is small, with only 11k developers, compared to more than 287k active React developers.

Debugging

Another important point when looking at the Svelte vs React battle is debugging. React’s debugging tools are well-developed and widely used by the community. 

Svelte’s debugging tools are less developed than React’s. However, this doesn’t mean that they are any less effective. Svelte’s compiler generates highly optimized code, which can make debugging more challenging. However, Svelte’s small API surface makes it easier to debug applications.

Maintenance

When it comes to maintenance, React wins over Svelte because it is maintained by Meta and a team of individual developers and companies. As a result, React has a dedicated team that works on the framework 24/7. But that’s not it! In the past few years, React saw quite a few big releases like functional components React Context, Hooks, etc., making it a favorite among many developers. 

But Svelte is no less. Svelte has an amazing maintenance team that works to keep the framework at the top of its game and in contention with React.

To conclude: when should you use Svelte and when should you use React?

When should you use Svelte and when should you use React

When should you use Svelte and when should you use React

Svelte and React have their own advantages and disadvantages. React is backed by Meta and hence quite reliable. Also, it’s a good choice for big projects that demand several features. React is also suitable for making complex user interfaces as it’s easy to create reusable components with the framework. Last but not least, React has a range of built-in features and tools. So if you need to develop large applications quickly, choose React. 

Svelte, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller projects that don’t demand a lot of features. Most importantly, Svelte is lightweight and uses less code. These features make it a wonderful option for projects with a focus on performance. What’s more, Svelte has a simpler learning curve, making it a good option for developers who are not too experienced with JavaScript. Furthermore, Svelte is perfect for building dynamic user interfaces as it compiles code into highly optimized JavaScript.

React vs Svelte: Who wins?

Consider your project requirements and the time you have first. The Svelte vs. React argument is straightforward when these two aspects are clearly defined. Use Svelte if performance and optimized code are your priorities. You can also go for Svelte for your projects to achieve a smaller bundle size, maintainable code, and exceptional performance without the VDOM. Due to the simplicity of the framework, Svelte enables developers to prepare a website faster. 

But if you need to build heavy, complex applications quickly, go for React. React makes it easy to maintain the stability of your application. An active community of React developers helps resolve doubts and bugs observed during development. 

If you’re an employer, using React for your projects will make it easier to hire software developers. Developing stable software products using React and Svelte requires companies to hire experienced software developers. Turing can help you hire brilliant, pre-vetted remote software developers for your projects at unbelievable prices. Visit the Hire page for more information.

If you’re a software developer looking for remote Svelte jobs or remote React jobs, try Turing. Work with top US companies and earn higher than your peers. Visit the Apply for Jobs page now. 

FAQs

Is Svelte better than React?

Yes, Svelte is a better option for you if you’re working on smaller projects that don’t demand a lot of features. As Svelte is lightweight and uses less code, it’s a wonderful option for projects with a focus on performance. Svelte has a simpler learning curve, making it a great option for developers who are not too experienced with JavaScript. Furthermore, Svelte is perfect for building dynamic user interfaces as it compiles code into highly optimized JavaScript.

What is better Svelte or React in 2023?

React and Svelte are excellent choices if you’re looking to build user interfaces. While React is great for building larger applications efficiently, Svelte is better suited for smaller applications demanding high performance.

Should I switch from React to Svelte?

If your priority is performance and optimized code, then go for Svelte. But if you’re looking to build large and complex applications quickly, then React may be the better option. In addition, if you want to build dynamic user interfaces, then Svelte is the better choice.

Is Svelte smaller than React?

Yes, Svelte is smaller than React in terms of bundle size because Svelte compiles your code at build time, resulting in smaller and more efficient code. On the other hand, React uses a larger runtime library to manage the component state and update the DOM. However, the actual size difference will depend on the specific project and its dependencies.

Is Svelte worth learning?

Yes, Svelte is definitely worth learning in 2023 as it is a popular JavaScript framework used for building user interfaces in web applications. Its fast performance, small size, and easy-to-learn syntax make it an attractive option for developers. Additionally, Svelte’s growing popularity suggests that it will continue to be relevant in the web development industry.

Svelte is a better choice for small to medium-sized projects with simpler components, where fast performance and a small codebase are essential. 

React is more suitable for large-scale projects with complex components and state management requirements, where a larger ecosystem of tools and libraries is needed. 

 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By , May 5, 2023
Golang vs. Java What Should You Pick
Software Comparisons

Golang vs. Java: What Should You Pick?

Golang vs Java: Go is a statically typed, multi-paradigm, compiled, & general-purpose programming language by Google. Java is Sun Microsystem’s class-based, general-purpose, object-oriented programming language.

The Golang vs Java comparison pitches two notoriously fast backend programming languages. Is Golang better than Java? Is Golang harder than Java? Will Golang replace Java? This blog post will highlight the various related to Golang and provide you with enough information to decide what’s best for you.

Java has been around for a long time, curating its position as a powerhouse in the software industry for backend development. Golang, on the other hand, is relatively new. Developers use Golang and Java worldwide. Both languages compete directly for control of server-side web applications.

However, they also compete in other areas, such as learning time, web development, performance, developer payout, and more. 

This post highlights the similarities, differences, and business applications of each language. 

Let’s get started.

Table of content

  1. Golang
  2. Java
  3. Golang vs Java: Comparison
    • Golang vs Java: Features
    • Golang vs Java: Performance
    • Golang vs Java: Community
    • Golang vs Java: Usage
    • Golang vs Java: Application
    • Golang vs Java: Popularity
  4. Which is best for web development – Golang or Java?
  5. Summary

Golang 

Launched in 2011, Go or Golang is an open-source language from Google. Similar to Java, Golang is a statically typed, multi-paradigm, compiled, and general-purpose programming language. 

Go’s syntax is close to ‘C’ as the language’s compiler was built in C. But it is now written in Golang, allowing the language to remain self-hosted. 

Golang is a concurrent programming language built for modern multicore processors, meaning it can perform several tasks at once. It also features deferred garbage collection, which manages memory to run programs quickly.

Java

Java is a statically typed general-purpose programming language released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. 

Initially, Java used to be the preferred language for server-side applications. However, that is no longer the case now. Despite this, hundreds of applications around the world use Java. Various platforms, ranging from old software on servers to modern data science and ML applications, are built on Java. 

There are ample pre-built modules and codes available because Java is famous among developers. These modules and developer availability make coding in Java easy.

Java is versatile. Meaning, the language runs anywhere there’s a processor. It’s similar to a compiled language where the virtual machine breaks down the code into bytecode before compiling it. 

Golang vs Java: Comparison 

Golang vs Java

Golang vs Java

Golang and Java are high-performing server-side languages that have some relationship to ‘C.’ But which language wins the Golang vs Java battle? Here is a side-by-side comparison. 

  1. Golang vs Java: Features

    Golang and Java provide ample features. However, Java is better suited for complex tasks because it is object-oriented. Object-Oriented Programming (OOP) drives code reuse thereby creating a better developer experience. In addition, Java enables the code to self-reflect during runtime to spot errors. 

    Golang is not an object-oriented language, and it does not support inheritance or reflection, making it less flexible than Java.

    Garbage collection is one of Golang’s most important features. Garbage collection is also available in Java, but it isn’t as powerful. Garbage collection helps in handling huge codebases.

    In addition, the concurrency of Golang is also an essential characteristic. ‘Goroutines’ enables functions or procedures to run parallelly to each other. Java has multithreading capabilities that provide a similar effect, although significantly less powerful than Golang’s.
  2. Golang vs Java: Performance

    Even though Java is quick, Golang outperforms Java in most metrics.

    Java’s lack of performance is partly due to its virtual machine for Java compilation. Though it allows Java to run on any platform, this virtual machine reduces its speed.

    Golang has the upper hand. In Golang, testing is easy, and the user experience is better. Golang is quick because it is similar to ‘C’.

    Also, the memory management in Golang contributes to its speed. When it comes to unnecessary object references, automatic garbage collection eliminates the need for pausing.

    Related post: C++ vs Java: What Programming Language Should You Choose?
  3. Golang vs Java: Community

    Java is older and more popular than Golang.

    Some years ago, Java was the most extensively used server-side programming language. Today, Java competes with Python for that title, but Java still has a larger community than Golang.

    Recruiters can easily find Java developers. Also, Java developers easily get guidance from the Java community, as it is large and widespread. 
  4. Golang vs Java: Usage

    Golang is a breeze to use.

    Golang’s syntax is unique. For English speakers, the language is simple to read and write. Golang has a total of 25 keywords to define predetermined actions as well as internal operations. Also, Golang’s library is small, which makes skimming easy.

    And, unlike most programming languages, Golang’s syntax eliminates brackets, parentheses, and the colons that programmers frequently use at the end of lines.

    Java is complex. The use of Java necessitates a developer’s undivided attention. However, working with Java’s sophisticated syntax offers flexibility and loose coupling.

    Related post: ​​What Are the Best Programming Languages for AI Development?
  5. Golang vs Java: Application

    Although Java and Golang are both server-side languages, their applications are different.

    JVM enables Java to run across platforms with little to no difficulty, making Java a great cross-platform programming language.

    Golang is limited in its reach. For example, Golang converts code into a binary file to run on any platform. Meaning, building a binary file for individual platforms will take you more time than needed.

    Related post: Node.js vs. Golang: Which One’s Best for You?

    It is time-consuming to compile the various binary files for each platform. So if you want portability, Java is the best option.

    While Golang may not be your first choice for building a mobile app, it can still have a place in your tech stack if you want to optimize your backend. Golang’s parallelism makes it an excellent choice for machine learning, but only when Python or Java isn’t available.
  6. Golang vs Java: Popularity

    Even today, Java is the most used server-side language. And so, you will see Java racing with Python, Go, and many other popular languages. In other words, Java is a veteran in comparison to Go. And so, when it comes to popularity, Java easily beats Go.

    These days, the new coding community primarily opts for Go as their server-side language. Java has massive open-source data online. In addition, the community is super active with round-the-clock feedback.

    But Go is no less. You will find several open-source libraries, code examples, and other seasoned Go coders guiding new adopters and delivering consistent feedback.

Which is best for web development – Golang or Java?

Golang vs. Java What is best for web development (1)

Golang vs. Java What is best for web development (1)

Both Java and Golang excel at back-end web development.

Java is extremely platform-agnostic. The JVM allows developers to build web applications on Linux, Windows, and OSX without compiling them into binary every time. It also has a strong community that provides assistance, tools, and tech stacks to create complex servers quickly. 

However, Java’s major use has shifted from backend web development to backend mobile development, to the point that Google now uses Java virtually exclusively for Android apps.

On the other hand, large-scale network servers use Golang for their operations. Golang features built-in support for HTTP/2 and provides web development flexibility, scalability, and simplicity in a way that Java cannot. 

Also, developers don’t have to worry about utilizing third-party web servers or libraries because there are enough existing tools to construct web servers.

Summary

Java and Golang are powerful, popular, and useful. But still, they have significant differences. Go is better suited for microservices whereas Java is better for large systems and projects with good timelines. Java is older, object-oriented, and has a larger library and community. Golang is a multi-paradigm and better supports concurrency. While Golang runs faster than Java, Java has more features and better support. Go has a leaner learning curve as compared to Java. If simplicity and memory management are your priority, then Go is a good option.

Deciding which language is best for professional use depends on what kind of websites or applications you’re developing. If you are a software developer looking for remote Java jobs or remote Golang jobs, try Turing. With Turing, you can land high-paying, long term jobs with top US companies, right from the comfort of your home. Want to know more? Click on the Apply for Jobs button.


FAQs

  1. Is Golang faster than Java?

    Golang is generally faster than Java for certain types of applications, particularly those that require a lot of concurrencies. However, Java has better memory management, which can make it more suitable for applications such as financial systems, healthcare applications, e-commerce platforms, etc.

  2. Can Golang replace Java?

    Golang and Java have different strengths. While Golang is popular for applications requiring high concurrency and microservices architecture, Java is great for enterprise-scale applications with a large and mature ecosystem of libraries and frameworks. The choice between the two depends on the specific project requirements and the development team’s skillset. It’s not a matter of one language completely replacing the other.

  3. Is Golang in demand in 2023?

    Golang is expected to continue to be in demand in 2023 and beyond. Golang’s popularity has been growing steadily over the past few years, particularly for building microservices and cloud-native applications, and it is likely to continue to be a popular choice for these types of applications. Additionally, Golang’s strong performance and concurrency features make it an attractive option for certain industries, such as finance and healthcare, where speed and reliability are crucial.

  4. Should I learn Go or Java?

    The choice between learning Go and Java depends on your goals and project requirements. Java is commonly used for large-scale enterprise applications, while Go is often used for microservices and cloud-native applications. Consider the specific context and learning curve of each language before making a decision. Java has a larger standard library and a more complex syntax which makes it a bit challenging to learn. On the other hand, Golang has a simpler syntax, with fewer language features and a smaller standard library, which can make it easier to learn.

  5. Are Golang developers in demand?

    Yes, Golang developers are in demand in organizations building microservices, cloud-native applications, or apps with a need for high performance and concurrency. Golang’s popularity has been growing steadily over the past few years, but the demand for Golang developers may vary based on region, industry, and job market trends.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Apr 25, 2023
Progressive Web Apps vs Native Apps What Should You Pick
Software Comparisons

Progressive Web Apps vs Native Apps: What Should You Pick?

Progressive Web Apps vs Native Apps: PWAs are apps that work seamlessly on any device, regardless of the platform, be it mobile, desktop, or tablet. Native.apps

The progressive web apps vs native apps battle intrigues many developers and businesses. So, will progressive web apps (PWAs) replace native apps in the future? What is the difference between PWA and native apps? What are the strengths and weaknesses of PWAs and native apps? Keep reading this blog post to find out. 

According to a report by Statista, smartphone subscriptions worldwide today surpass six billion. This number is predicted to grow further by several hundred million in the next few years. This creates an exciting opportunity for businesses to leverage the power of mobile apps to offer seamless user experiences. However, the last few years have seen rising support for progressive web apps (PWAs), and companies now face a pressing question: should they build a PWA or a native app? 

Also, read: React Native vs Swift: iOS Mobile App Development

Let’s explore the key differences between progressive web apps (PWAs) and native apps and determine which is better in 2024. Let’s get started!

Progressive web apps vs Native apps: What are the differences between PWAs and native apps? 

PWAs are web apps that can work seamlessly on any device, regardless of the platform, be it mobile, desktop, or tablet. PWAs offer a native app-like experience with the convenience of a website. They leverage modern web capabilities like service workers, and web app manifests to deliver a seamless user experience. PWAs can be easily installed on a user’s home screen, allowing them to access the app quickly without the need to go through the app store.

Native apps, on the other hand, are applications that are built specifically for a particular platform, such as iOS or Android. Native apps are installed on a user’s device through an app store, designed to take advantage of the device’s hardware and software capabilities. Native apps are built using specific programming languages and tools native to the platform, making them highly optimized for the platform they run on.

Also, read What Is Best for App Development: Flutter, Dart Language or Something Else?

What are some PWA and native app examples?

Let’s take a look at them below. 

  • Twitter Lite: Twitter launched its PWA in 2017 and offered its users web push notifications, an “Add to Homescreen” prompt, and temporary offline browsing. Twitter achieved a 75 percent increase in Tweets sent, a 20 percent reduction in the bounce rate, and a 65 percent increase in pages per session. 
  • Flipkart: In 2015, Flipkart launched its PWA and reported a 70 percent increase in conversion rate, a 40 percent increase in re-engagement rate, and increased time spent on site by 3x.
  • Starbucks: In 2017, Starbucks launched its PWA and reported a 23 percent increase in order diversity and a 2x increase in their daily active users.
  • Pinterest: After launching its PWA, Pinterest noticed a 60 percent increase in core engagements and a 44 percent increase in ad revenue rate.

Let’s look at some successful examples of native apps:

  • Instagram: With over 2.3 billion active monthly users, Instagram is the second most-downloaded app globally. This native app allows users to share photos and videos with friends and followers.
  • Uber: Uber is a ride-hailing app that allows users to book rides on demand. The annual revenue generated by Uber in 2022 was $31.8 billion, with an 82.62% increase from the previous year.
  • Spotify: Spotify is the world’s leading music streaming application, with over 205 million premium subscribers worldwide. The app allows users to listen to their favorite songs and discover new music. 
  • Headspace: With 1.32 million downloads worldwide in the fourth quarter of 2022, Headspace is a meditation and mindfulness app that helps users reduce stress and anxiety and is popular for its recognizable animations.

Read, also: Top 3 Databases for iOS Mobile Applications

Progressive web apps pros and cons

Here are the main pros and cons of PWAs you need to keep in mind. 

Pros

  • Cost-effective: Progressive web apps require less development time and are easier to maintain, resulting in lower development costs than native apps.
  • Fast and responsive: They offer quick loading and a smooth user experience due to the service worker technology that enables offline usage and caching.
  • Cross-platform compatibility: PWAs are built using web standards and are accessible on any device or browser, including desktops, mobile, and tablets.
  • Lower storage requirements: They take up less space on a device than native apps.
  • SEO-friendly: PWA can be indexed by search engines like any other website, which means better visibility on search engine result pages (SERPs).
  • Secure: PWAs are secure as they follow HTTPS protocols and transmit encrypted information.

Cons

  • Limited access to native device features: Progressive web apps may be unable to access all of the features available on a user’s device, including push notifications, a camera, and an accelerometer.
  • Limited discoverability: PWA is not widely available on app stores like Google Play or Apple App Store.
  • Security risks: PWAs are vulnerable to cyberattacks and may require additional security measures to protect user data.
  • Limited user engagement: Progressive web apps may not have the same engagement as native apps, such as social sharing or user-generated content.

Native apps pros and cons 

Just like PWAs, native apps come with their own pros and cons. They’re as follows. 

Pros

  • Fast & efficient: Native apps are faster and more efficient compared to web apps as they are designed specifically for the platform they are running on.
  • Better user experience: They offer a better user experience as they can use the features and hardware of the device to their fullest potential.
  • High performance: Native apps can be accessed offline, providing better performance and stability.
  • Offline mode: They can use push notifications and provide offline data storage.
  • Accessible: Native apps can be downloaded from app stores, making it easy for users to discover and install the app.

Cons 

  • Slow time to market (TTM):  Native apps require more resources and time to develop, requiring a separate version for each platform.
  • Frequent upgrades: Native apps must be updated and maintained separately for each platform.
  • Higher cost: The development cost of native apps is higher than web apps.
  • Lengthy downloading process: Native apps require users to download and install them, which can be a barrier to entry for some users.

Progressive web apps: Use cases

Let’s quickly look at the use cases of PWAs below.

  • Offline Mode: Progressive web apps work offline, making them an ideal choice for users who are traveling or have limited connectivity. The PWA can save the user’s data and allow them to continue using the app without a stable internet connection.
  • News and Media: Progressive web apps are an excellent choice for news and media companies that want to offer a fast, responsive mobile experience, such as Forbes, Medium, etc.
  • Travel and Hospitality: PWAs can help travel companies offer a fast and reliable booking experience by providing real-time updates on travel information, such as flight status, gate changes, and delays. Some well-known examples include Trivago, Make My Trip, Ola, etc.
  • Banking and Finance: PWAs are ideal for banking and finance companies as they can offer users the ability to access their accounts, check balances, and pay bills. Examples include payment systems such as PayPal and Stripe.
  • Health and Fitness: Progressive web apps can help health and fitness companies offer an interactive and personalized experience. They can provide users with workout plans, track their progress, and deliver customized tips and advice—for example, Fitbit, Headspace, Nike Training Club, etc.

Native apps: Use cases

And here are the use cases of native apps.

  • E-commerce: Native apps are often used for e-commerce businesses, allowing customers to purchase directly from their mobile devices—for example, Amazon, eBay, etc.
  • Social media: Popular social media apps like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter are all native apps, allowing users to easily access and share content on their mobile devices.
  • Gaming: Native apps are also commonly used for gaming, with popular titles like Candy Crush, Clash of Clans, and Angry Birds.
  • Education: Native apps are also used in education, with many schools and universities providing mobile apps that allow students to access course materials, communicate with instructors, and more. Some popular apps include Duolingo, Minecraft Education Edition, Photomath, etc.
  • Productivity: Native apps can also be used for increasing productivity, with popular apps like Microsoft Office, Evernote, and Trello.
  • Entertainment: Native apps are often used for entertainment purposes, with streaming services like Netflix, Hulu, and Disney+.

Progressive web apps vs Native apps: Which is better in 2024?

The answer to this question depends on various factors, such as your business goals, the target audience, and the required features. However, let’s look at the key differences between PWAs and native apps to determine which is better in 2024.

  • Development cost and time
    One of the primary reasons why businesses are turning towards PWAs is their development cost and time. Building a PWA is generally less expensive than a native app, and the development time is relatively shorter. PWAs are built using web technologies that are already familiar to developers and can be easily deployed to multiple platforms.
  • User experience
    Native apps offer a more polished and refined user experience than PWAs. Native apps are designed to take advantage of the hardware and software capabilities of the device, providing a seamless and responsive experience to users. On the other hand, PWAs are limited to the capabilities of the web browser and may not offer the same level of responsiveness as native apps.
  • Accessibility
    PWAs are more accessible than native apps, as they can be accessed on any device with a web browser. Native apps, on the other hand, are limited to a particular platform and require users to download and install the app before they can use it. This means that PWAs can reach a wider audience than native apps.
  • Maintenance and updates
    Maintaining and updating a PWA is generally easier than a native app. With PWAs, updates can be made on the server side, and users can access the latest version of the app without needing to download and install anything. On the other hand, native apps require users to download and install updates, which can be cumbersome.

Conclusion 

It takes careful planning and assessment of project requirements, resources, and timelines to choose the best technology for building your next mobile application. Both PWAs and native apps have their own pros and cons. You can take your pick based on various factors like product requirements, business goals, and target audience. If a business wants to reach a wider audience and save development costs and time, then PWAs are a better choice. On the other hand, if a business wants to provide a more refined and polished user experience and take advantage of the hardware and software capabilities of the device, native apps are what they need. 

If you’re looking to hire pre-vetted, skilled app developers, Turing’s got you covered. Hire from a talent pool of 50k+ developers and engineers ready to work in your timezone. Visit the Hire Developers page to know more.

If you’re a developer looking for top remote US software jobs, you’re at the right place. Head over to the Apply for Jobs page for more information.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Mar 17, 2023
Black box testing vs white box testing
Software Comparisons

Black Box Testing vs White Box Testing: Understanding Key Differences

Black Box Testing vs White Box Testing: Black box testing is the process of checking how software behaves, whereas white box testing checks how different ……

What is the difference between black box testing vs white box testing? What are common black box testing techniques? What are common white box testing techniques? What are the steps to perform black box testing? What are the different types of white box testing?

Let’s answer all these questions one by one.

What is black box testing?

Black box testing is a testing method wherein the testing team does not know about the internal structure and design of an application. This testing happens by comparing the input value and output value. 

Black box testing focuses on understanding user experience and happens post-completion of software applications or products. 

What are the steps to perform black box testing?

Steps to perform black box testing include…

  1. Examine system requirements and specifications
  2. Create a positive test scenario to check if the system processes requests correctly
  3. Create a negative test scenario to check the system’s capability to identify issues
  4. Determine expected outputs for all inputs
  5. Construct and execute test cases
  6. Compare outputs with inputs
  7. Validate the right results and fix persisting issues

What is white box testing?

White box testing is a testing method wherein the testing team examines the internal structure and design of an application. With white box testing, the team checks the data flow from input to output

White box testing focuses on finding hidden errors and optimizing code for a more efficient software application or product. 

What are the steps to perform white box testing?

Steps to perform white box testing include….

  1. Identification of component, feature, or program for testing
  2. Mapping all possible paths in a flow chart
  3. Integrating user journey, use cases, and technical information in a flow chart
  4. Writing test cases to cover each path in the flow chart
  5. Testing and checking whether you get the desired outcomes

    Related Post: 10 Popular Software Testing Trends in 2024

Black box testing vs white box testing: Key differences 

Black box testing vs white box testing

Key differences between black box testing and white box testing

What are some common black box testing techniques?

Common black box testing techniques include …

  1. Equivalence partitioning

    Equivalence partitioning divides data into partitions of valid and invalid values wherein the partitions exhibit the same behavior. If a condition of one partition is false, then the condition of the other partition should also be false, and vice-versa.

    For example, if you create a software function that accepts 6 digits to verify an OTP, then each partition of that function with six digits should be able to check the value. Also, if you enter more or less than six digits, the function should direct the user to the error page.
  2. Error guessing

    Yet another popular black box testing technique is error guessing. This technique involves identifying problematic areas of software with common testing questions. There is no specific method of error guessing. The tester must rely on their experience and test cases for other applications.

    Some of the common error-guessing questions include…

    Null pointer exceptions
    Entering invalid parameters
    Dividing by zero
    Uploading maximum files to test file limit
    Checking buttons without entering values
    Blank space in text fields
  3. Boundary value analysis

    Boundary value analysis is among the necessary black box testing techniques that check boundary values that are prone to error. The tester checks whether the software produces the correct output upon entering the boundary value.
  4. State transition testing

    State transition testing uses inputs to check for the desired output. The objective of state transition testing is to see if there is a change in the system during the transition from one state to another.

    The tester must analyze transition data and design test cases to probe what happens when the system transitions from one state to another and does not give desired outputs.
  5. Decision table testing

    Decision table testing tests the software system for outcomes produced by different input combinations. By using decision table testing, you can check all the possible conditions necessary for generating the desired output.

    Black box testing techniques

    Decision table testing is a popular black box testing technique.

What are some common white box testing techniques?

Common white box testing techniques include …

  1. Statement coverage testing

    Statement coverage is code inclusion testing that calculates the number of explanations implemented in the source code of an application. Also, it ensures that all statements in the code run at least once.

    By using statement coverage as one of your white box testing techniques, you can eliminate dead code and uncover unused statements.

    The formula of statement coverage is as follows:

    Number of statements implemented / Total number of statements
  2. Branch coverage testing

    The next white box testing technique is the branch coverage testing method. In this technique, the tester identifies all conditional and unconditional branches. Also, the tester ensures that each branch has conditional logic and undergoes unit tests.

    For example, A, B, and C are conditional branches if the system implements them upon meeting a condition, whereas D can be an unconditional branch that the system executes every time after executing A.

    The formula of branch coverage is as follows:

    Number of branches implemented / Total number of branches
  3. Path coverage testing

    Path coverage testing is a structured process that allows the tester to check each line of code. Path testing helps focus on program logic as you can check vital parts of code through cyclomatic complexity and unit tests.

    For example, in this code below,

    If a > b
    // do something
    Else
    // do nothing

    In the above code, the tester will first create a flow diagram by breaking the code into separate statements. After that, the tester will create different paths for outcomes. Finally, the tester will calculate cyclomatic complexity and run a unit test to validate codes.

    In the example, the cyclomatic complexity is 2, as a minimum of 2 test cases are necessary to cover all code execution paths.

    Related Post: Unit Testing vs Integration Testing: 4 Key Differences Explained

Summary

Black box testing focuses on software behavior, whereas white box testing focuses on the internal functioning of the software. Testers require both testing methods at different stages of product development. 

So, organizations must carefully understand the differences between black box testing and white box testing to choose the best testing method for their applications and software.

Are you looking to hire developers familiar with black-box testing and white-box testing?

Try Turing. 

Turing helps you hire the top 1 percent of developers in 3-5 days. Companies can choose from a pool of 3 million developers with 100+ skills to find a suitable candidate. 


FAQs

1. What are the different types of white box testing?

Different types of white box testing include…

White box penetration testing – In this method, an ethical hacker attacks an application based on knowledge of its code and design.
Unit testing – Unit testing tests all written code to see if it works as expected.
Mutation testing – Mutation testing checks code resilience by making small changes to the code structure.
Integration testing – This method checks integration points in the internal software and external systems.
Static code analysis – This method uses machine learning and predefined patterns to identify issues in static codes.

2. What are the different types of black box testing?

Different types of black box testing include….

Functional testing – Functional testing validates software against functional requirements and specifications.
Non-functional testing – Non-functional testing checks how the system operates rather than the specific functions of the system.
Regression testing – Regression testing checks whether a system behaves differently after updates or code improvements. 

 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Nov 29, 2022
Strengths and Weaknesses for Interviews
Software Comparisons

10 Strengths and Weaknesses for Job Interviews

Strengths and weaknesses for job interviews: 1. Leadership skills 2. Communication skills 3. Dedication 4. Positive attitude 5. Hard skills 6. Obsession with tiny details

How do you answer the question: what are your strengths and weaknesses? Why do interviewers ask about strengths and weaknesses in a job interview? What are common employee strengths? What are common employee weaknesses?

This blog post will help you answer all of the above questions. 

Why do interviewers ask about strengths and weaknesses?

Every interviewer asks questions to learn about the value you will bring to the organization. So, by asking about your strengths and weaknesses, they try to figure out the following…

  • Whether you are conscious of your best qualities and how you apply them at work. 
  • Whether you can discuss your shortcomings and how you try to overcome them. 
  • Whether your qualities and skills will complement existing team members.

And so, bragging about your strengths while hiding weaknesses can make you appear arrogant. On the other hand, answering such questions correctly gives you a great opportunity to show the interviewer that you’re a self-aware individual. 

Remember, interviewers love honest, humble candidates who know their strengths and are willing to admit their weaknesses. 

How do you talk about your strengths during an interview?

Most applicants wonder how to answer the question: what are your strengths? So don’t worry. You’re not alone. To begin with, ensure you answer the question in a professional manner without boasting or coming off as egocentric. You can even share an engaging story that highlights your strong suits rather than just giving a one-lined, bland answer like: I’m detail-oriented and hard-working. 

Make a list of your personal strengths, or ask a friend to assist you in this process. If you are not aware of your strengths, you can take free online assessments or follow the below-mentioned steps. 

Here are six steps to identify your strengths…

  1. Brainstorm: Sit down and list your strengths. Think really hard and aim for at least 10. Take notes of every strength you can think of. You can always make changes to the list later. 
  2. Prepare examples: Instead of just mentioning the strength in one word, share an example based on your work experience where you displayed your strength. Scroll down for some examples if you’re unsure how to do this.
  3. Be accurate: Make sure to pick the skills you actually have. Refrain from sounding too general. Choose “relationship building” or “persuasive communication” instead of “people skills” or “good communicator.” The latter are often overused.
  4. Don’t be too modest: This is not the time to be self-conscious. You need to use this question to show what value you can bring to the company. And so, it is important to practice your answers. If you plan ahead, you will be able to answer the question in a way that feels natural and genuine. 
  5. Look for hints in your performance reviews: Go through past performance assessments. Look for the compliments you received from your peers and manager. Go through old emails that praised your work. 
  6. Get technical: Several online tools can help you identify your strengths. All you need to do is answer a series of questions to obtain a report that lists your key strengths.

Here are five common strengths and examples of each…

  • Leadership skills
    A great example of strength for a job interview is leadership skills. Demonstrating this skill can help you land a key managerial role. You can list instances in your previous company where you guided your peers to do better or spearheaded a project to achieve a goal.

    Sample answer: I managed a large marketing team and helped new recruits crack their first assignment by guiding them throughout the project. With the same ad budget allocated to our team as the previous quarter, I was able to increase sales by 30 percent. 

  • Communication skills
    Candidates with good communication skills leave a lasting impression on recruiters. They come across as strong, confident individuals. There are four main types of communication: Verbal, non-verbal, visual, and written. In a job interview, you should be well-prepared to leverage all four. 

    Sample answer: As a part of my last role, I communicated with a variety of clients on a day-to-day basis. I made sure to understand their requirements clearly before working on them. I also crosschecked all information before conveying it ahead. In addition, I ensured there were no communication silos in the team by promoting transparency. 

  • Dedication
    Dedication and commitment are important traits that can help candidates impress recruiters. Candidates who can convince recruiters that they have the hunger for success and give their 110 percent do well in the hiring process.

    Sample answer: I am a passionate and disciplined individual who works with dedication and commitment on assigned projects. I take care of every little detail to ensure that the objective we have set out to achieve gets accomplished at all costs.
  • Positive attitude  
    Candidates with a positive attitude always look at the bright side and face challenges in a stride. They work toward finding a solution instead of getting stumped. Naturally, such individuals are a great asset to any company. Their optimism keeps the team’s morale high and drives them to do better.

    Sample answer: My greatest source of strength is a positive attitude that helps me approach things with a forward-thinking mindset. I look to fix problems instead of crying over their outcome. My seniors in the previous company always praised my optimism and said that it served as motivation for them. 

  • Hard skills
    Along with soft skills, it is equally important to share a few hard skills relevant to the job role as strengths for job interviews. Hard skills are objective, quantifiable skills gained through education, training, or work experiences. Hard skills can often be taught or learned. And so, hard skills can be easily proven — you either know how to write code, or you don’t. 

    Sample answer: I am a software developer with 10 years of experience with programming languages like JavaScript, Python, Kotlin, C#, Go, and PHP, among others. I am also well-versed in front-end and back-end frameworks, cloud computing, big data analytics, and microservices architecture. 

Here are a few more examples to answer – What are your greatest strengths?

  1. I’ve always picked things quickly. My hunger to keep learning and evolving as a person is one of my key strengths. I work hard to become a better version of myself every day.
  2. I am great at interacting with others, working in a variety of teams, and collaborating on a wide range of projects. As the head boy of my school, I encouraged my batch mates to participate in school events to ensure representation. In college, I participated in extracurricular activities with the drama and debate community, volunteered for NGOs, and was also nominated as a campus ambassador for several internships.
  3. My ability to relate to people and comprehend their needs is my greatest strength. For example, during one summer internship, I got a call from an angry customer who had been terminated from our service. The company was unable to help her. However, I helped her consider other options and she got really happy with the solution. 

Related post: Ten Tips to Crack a Software Developer Job Interview

How do you talk about your weaknesses?

One of the most dreaded interview questions is: what are your weaknesses? 

Here’s the thing: it’s okay to talk about your weaknesses. All you need to do is find the right balance while doing so. Claiming you have no flaws can make you sound arrogant in the interview. On the other hand, listing down too many can harm your chances of landing a job. 

You must project an air of humility while talking about your weaknesses. At the same time, you must also show a strong willingness to overcome them. For this, you need to identify shortcomings that you’re already working on. Ask a friend or close coworker to help you with this. If you’re still struggling…

Here are three steps to identify your weaknesses…

  1. Self-evaluate: Look at your past performance and make a list of the instances where you fell short of expectations. Examine this list to identify patterns. These patterns are can be your weak points.
  2. Solicit feedback: Asking for feedback from coworkers or supervisors is one of the best strategies to recognize your professional inadequacies. Your colleagues certainly know your working style better than anybody else and can provide good insights.
  3. Review performance metrics: You can examine this qualitative data from your previous performance evaluations to get a better understanding of any weaknesses. 

If the above-mentioned steps do not help, pick some weaknesses and examples from the list below that are most relatable to your personality.

Here are five common weaknesses and examples of each…

  • Obsession with small details
    A major weakness for job interviews is the inability to submit projects on time till everything is perfect. Candidates who obsess over the tiniest of details and worry over things not being perfect often miss the big picture. Recruiters want candidates who do not compromise the project in terms of both time and work quality.

    Sample answer: My weakness is that I overanalyze my projects and redo them without getting initial client feedback. I am working on this area by sharing my project progress with my colleagues and seniors so that I do not compromise my team’s productivity and project deadlines. 

  • Difficulty saying no
    Candidates who find it difficult to say no can find themselves taking on more work than they can do. Candidates who overwork comprise not only their own but also their team’s work quality. And so recruiters prefer hiring candidates who’re aware of the fine line between dedication and overworking. 

    Sample answer: I want to tell you that I find it difficult to say no to my seniors and colleagues. I think I will upset them, and it will negatively affect our professional relationship. However, I am working on this trait as I understand that if I keep doing it, I will suffer from constant burnout and eventually hamper my team’s performance. 

  • Lack of self-awareness
    Self-awareness is essential in giving an honest assessment of one’s skills. Candidates who lack self-awareness can find it difficult to talk about their strengths and weaknesses in job interviews. In contrast, self-aware candidates know their strong suits and shortcomings well.

    Sample answer: I did not know that I was bad at integrating code until my previous manager revealed it to me. After that, I took some code integration workshops and attended coding boot camps where they taught code integrations. I am slowly improving and am open to such feedback from my colleagues. 

  • Delegation
    Lack of delegation skills can prove to be a major challenge for employees irrespective of their job position. Candidates who cannot delegate in a timely organized manner need to trust their colleagues more and offer them a chance to learn and grow.

    Sample answer: I find it difficult to delegate as I think I am not in control of the project anymore. I have worked hard to get over this mindset and constantly tell myself that it is my duty to help other team members learn from me. Now I am delegating more and more tasks to my colleagues. However, I make sure to go over everything once before sending it ahead.

  • Striking a good work-life balance
    Candidates who fail to strike a good work-life balance start hating their job eventually. After spending all the time at work, candidates can feel depressed and lonely. Such candidates need to organize their tasks and plan their time. So, they can turn one of their weaknesses for job interviews into their strengths.

    Sample answer: It was quite difficult to strike a balance between work and my personal life. I used to neglect my family for work and often miss out on important days. After a while, I discussed this with my HR and now I have a new timetable for work which tells me to get out of the office early on specific days.

Here are a few more examples to answer – What are your biggest weaknesses?

  1. My tendency to be overly critical of myself is my biggest weakness. Early in my career, I always concentrated on what I wasn’t particularly good at rather than appreciating how far I had gone and how I could improve. I’ve discovered that deliberately seeking out opportunities to reflect and put more of an emphasis on accomplishments while also continuously bettering myself is the greatest method to break this behavior.
  2. I strive for perfection. I always look for ways to make things better until I’m satisfied with them, sometimes even going above and beyond. My friends always expressed concern about this habit of mine. I didn’t realize it myself until a college assignment a few years ago. My drive to strive for perfection nearly cost my team the course’s credits. I took that as a lesson and have since made it a point to complete tasks on time, with my best effort, and with a sense of satisfaction.
  3. My biggest flaw is that sometimes I deprioritize simple tasks and only work on challenging jobs. However, I’m currently working on this issue. I am learning to prioritize tasks according to submission deadlines. I have also started asking my colleagues and managers to put specific timelines or priority levels for all tasks. 

Related post: Six Common Interview Mistakes Remote Developers Make

List of common strengths and weaknesses

Strength

Weakness

Creative

Versatile

Disciplined

Proactive

Honest

Dedicated

Fast Learner

Self-aware

Self-critical

Insecure

Extremely Introverted

Extremely Extroverted

Too detail-oriented

Too sensitive

Impatience

Difficulty delegating tasks

Summary 

To answer questions related to strengths and weaknesses for job interviews, it is important that you are honest with yourself and the interviewer. In addition, you must narrate your personal experiences and tie them with the question that interviewers ask to give a compelling answer that can increase your chance of getting a job. 

Are you looking for software development jobs?

Try Turing. Turing offers remote software developer jobs with unmatched compensation and long-term career growth in top US companies. Visit our jobs page to know more.


FAQs

  1. How do you answer what are your strengths and weaknesses for job interviews?
    While discussing your strengths and weaknesses in a job interview, ensure that you narrate personal or professional incidents that made you aware of your strong suits and shortcomings. 
  1. What are common employee strengths?
    Some common employee strengths include leadership skills, communication skills, self-motivation, empathy, initiative, and patience, among others. 
  1. What are common employee weaknesses?
    Some common employee weaknesses include lack of delegation, insecurity, no self-awareness, lack of confidence, and no knowledge of particular skills, among others. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Nov 24, 2022
R vs Python programming language
Software Comparisons

R vs Python: Which Is Better?

R is a statistical programming language used for data analysis and visualization. Python is a general-purpose programming language used for deployment and production.

Is R better than Python? Is R easier than Python? Why is Python more popular than R? Do most companies use R or Python? Who is the winner in the R vs Python battle? 

Keep reading this blog post to find out.

What is Python?

Python is a high-level, general-purpose programming language. Python focuses on code readability with a decluttered visual layout and simple syntax. Python primarily emphasizes syntactic sugar – a simple, consistent syntax design focusing on keywords instead of punctuations. Dutch programmer Guido Van Rossum released the first version of Python, Python 0.9.0, on 20th February 1991.

Python is flexible, easy to learn, free, and accessible. Python hosts many open-source libraries for data wrangling, processing, and analysis. Programmers prefer Python for its versatility, code efficiency, debugging capabilities, embeddable code, and other sophisticated functionalities.

Related Post: Python for Data Scraping and Data Wrangling

What is R?

R is a programming language and environment for statistical computing and graphics. R is primarily used for statistical computing, data analysis, visualization, and more. Data miners, statisticians, data scientists, and researchers rely on R and its packages for a wide range of applications. R, its libraries, and its user-developed packages host robust features that are very useful for data scientists. 

Statisticians Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman developed ‘R’, an open-source programming language, in 1993.

R programming language includes data structures like vectors, arrays, lists, and data frames that define the method of data processing. R also supports an array of arithmetics, graphs, computationally intensive tasks, and a wide range of statistical techniques.

Both R and Python have some unique features, advantages, disadvantages, and individual use cases. They produce different forms of outputs and solve data analysis problems with different methodologies. 

R vs Python for Data Science 

Data science is an interdisciplinary field that applies information from data across a wide range of applications by using scientific methods, procedures, algorithms, and systems to infer knowledge and insights from noisy, structured, and unstructured data. According to some estimates, the market share of data science platforms will surpass $320 billion by 2026. 

People rely on data science to obtain insights from a given data set. The insights help them drive important decisions, devise strategies, plan budgets, and more. Data scientists use programming languages like Python, SQL, C++, Java, R, and Perl for data mining, analysis, cleaning, processing, visualizing, indexing, and organizing.

Python is the most widely used programming language for data science. More than two-thirds of data scientists globally rely on Python. However, R has also surfaced as a popular choice among data experts recently, as it can perform many complicated mathematical and statistical operations seamlessly.

Here is a detailed comparison of R and Python.

R vs Python

R vs Python: Key Differences

R vs Python: Which programming language should you choose?

Choosing the right programming language depends on many factors. Most junior developers prefer Python due to its syntactic sugar. Data scientists prefer R due to its analytical efficiency and progressive functionalities.

Similarly, software developers, web developers, systems administrators, and software engineers prefer Python due to its popularity and expansive range of libraries. Academicians, researchers, scientists, and data engineers prefer the R programming language, as it offers beautiful graphics for data visualization and the capability to process large data sets.

Both of these programming languages are unique in their way and have different applications and use cases. So, consider their popularity, functionality, and modularity to choose one.

Are you a skilled R or Python developer looking for a remote job? Try Turing!

Turing offers long-term, high-paying IS remote software jobs to software developers around the globe. Visit the Apply for Jobs page to learn more.


FAQs

  1. Is R better than Python?
    Data analysts who need to process large data sets and visualize them with attractive graphics would prefer R over Python. Junior developers who require basic web scraping, data processing, and scalability prefer Python.

  2. Is R easier than Python? 
    Both R and Python programming languages are easy to learn. However, Python has a better learning curve due to syntactic sugar, i.e., simple keyword-based syntax.

  3. Why is Python more popular than R?
    Python’s simplicity, large repository of libraries and packages, scalability, massive community support, and multi-functional features make Python more popular than R.

  4. Do most companies use R or Python?
    Most big techs, especially MAANG companies, use R and Python in combination for various tasks ranging from data processing and presentation to setting up web servers and web scraping.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 21, 2022
C++ vs Java
Software Comparisons

C++ vs Java: What Programming Language Should You Choose?

Java is user-friendly, easy to learn and implement. Contrarily, C++ is more advanced, performs faster, and needs experienced software engineers.

Which is better C++ vs Java? Which is more powerful C++ or Java? Should I learn C++ or Java in 2022? Keep reading this blog post to find out.

The choice of the programming language depends on multiple factors, such as its type, complexity, TTM (time to market), scalability, security, and more. Applications written in complex programming languages can be feature-packed, modular, and scalable. However, they require a long time to code. 

Knowing the technical differences between C++ and Java would help developers choose the right programming language for their projects. Let us explore the situations where C++ or Java could be an ideal choice for developers.

What is C++?

Danish scientist Bjarne Stroustrup developed C++ as an extension of C, or ‘C with Classes’ in 1985. C++ is one of the most popular programming languages in the world. Developers use C++ to develop full-fledged software applications and operating systems.

C++ is a multi-paradigm, object-oriented language with low-level memory management. Large-scale organizations like Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, NASA, Google, Amazon, and more heavily rely on C++.

In addition, C++ is a platform-independent programming language, so C++ programs can seamlessly run on many operating systems and interfaces.

What is Java? 

James Gosling, a Canadian computer scientist from Sun Microsystems, developed Java in 1995. Java is an open-source, high-level, general-purpose programming language that is designed to have minimum implementation coupling. Java is a WORA (write once, run anywhere) language that makes Java code compilation easy on all platforms.

Java is simple, reliable, secure, affordable, and portable. Developers use Java to develop applications for gaming consoles, general computers, smartphones, data centers, scientific computers, smartwatches, and more. Google, Airbnb, eBay, Spotify, Slack, Intel, and many other companies use Java for developing web applications.

What is the difference between C++ and Java?

C++ and Java resemble the syntax of C programming language. However, the ecosystems of Java and C++ are very different. C++ code can be called into C, C++ libraries, or API of operating systems. On the other hand, Java code is only ideal for Java-based libraries.

In addition, C++ interacts with hardware more effectively than Java due to its low-level nature and lack of automatic memory management. 

Here are the differences between C++ and Java in detail: 

  • Multiple inheritance

    In Object-oriented programming, multiple inheritance is when a child class inherits attributes and methods from a parent class. Java does not support multiple inheritance. However, C++ supports multiple inheritance features.

    Multiple inheritance helps create a DSL (domain-specific language), perform advanced calculations during compilation, and improve project type safety.
  • Code reusability

    For reusing code, both programming languages have generic versions of classes. Java offers generics and C++ hosts templates that work with any data type. C++ templates are more flexible and easy to implement for advanced programming purposes.

    C++ compilers can create customized functions or classes whenever different data types come in use. C++ also hosts template specialization, wherein templates can call custom functions. Depending on the type of parameters of top-level functions, particular data types are allowed to have specialized code.

    Java does not have template specialization and instead follows ‘type erasure.’ In the type erasure process, Java compilers create generic objects without data types. Type-checking is performed during compilation, but the behavior of a generic class cannot be modified based on its type parameters.

    Related Post: Kotlin vs. Java: What Should You Choose for Your Next Project?
  • Runtime reflection

    Java developers can view structural details of the Java code during runtime. This feature is ‘reflection,’ and it lets developers view the availability of members in a class/class type.

    C++ does not have a full-fledged reflection feature; instead, it offers RTTI or runtime type information. With RTTI, developers can detect specific object types, but they cannot view the object’s members and other similar information.
  • Memory management

    There are two main approaches to memory management: manual and automatic. For manual memory management, developers must keep track of code, objects, and elements to manually release unused memory.

    Java has an automatic memory management system called ‘garbage collection. Java’s garbage collection enables easier memory management and reduces errors caused by releasing memory, thereby reducing security vulnerabilities.

    On the other hand, C++ has ‘smart pointers’ that use reference counting for memory management. Destructors in C++ release the allocated memory when an object is removed.

    In addition, C++ supports heap allocation and stack allocation, while Java only supports heap allocation. Stack allocation can be faster, safer, and simpler due to the linear data structures of C++. The stack allocation of C++ also supports a programming technique known as RAII (Resource Allocation Is Initialization).
  • Runtime performance

    C++ outperforms Java, as C++’s manual memory management is faster than Java’s automatic garbage collection. However, Java can also perform better than C++ in some cases with the help of the JIT (Just In Time) compilation.

    In addition, the reduced usage of heap allocations in C++ requires less memory and performs better than the garbage collector of Java’s standard memory library. Nevertheless, Java is generally fast and an ideal choice for developing applications unless latency is a top priority.
  • Build and package management

    Build and package management is how developers build projects and connect external dependencies to the application.

    Build and package management affects developer efficiency, project timelines, update management, component tracking, and much more. Maven, a specialized Java tool, can transpose Java code to Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) like IntelliJ IDEA.

    Related Post: 7 Best Java IDEs and Editors in 2022

    C++ does not have a standard build and package management repository or tool. A few commercial C++ libraries are binary-formatted, which adds to the complexity of the coding process. 

Parameter

Java

C++

Learning curve

Java is a beginner-friendly programming language

C++ has a steep learning curve and a complicated syntax.

Runtime performance

Java has a slower runtime performance

C++ has a faster runtime performance

Smart pointers

Java lacks the smart pointers feature

C++ has a feature for reference counting smart pointers

Latency

Java applications have unpredictable latencies

The latency of C++ applications is predictable

Garbage collection

Global mark-and-sweep garbage collection can be performed in Java

C++ does not have the garbage collection feature

Memory allocation

Java has automatic memory allocation

Stack memory allocation can be defined in C++ apps

API interaction

Java applications require code written in C to interact with APIs

C++ programs can directly interact with low-level operating system APIs

Interaction with C libraries

Java applications require code written in C to interact with C libraries

C++ can directly interact with C libraries

Interaction with Java libraries

Java apps can directly interact with Java libraries

C++ requires JNI (Java Native Interface) to interact with Java libraries

Build and package management

Java features Maven for standardized build and package management

C++ needs third-party alternatives like Conan

Summary

Your choice of programming language between C++ and Java will depend on the specific requirements of your projects. C++ and Java both have their individual use cases and have certain advantages over each other. Therefore, there is no universal answer to the question of what programming language should be your primary choice between Java and C++.

Java is ideal for software developers who are not well-versed with low-level programming concepts. C++, however, is ideal for software developers who wish to create games, operating systems, desktop applications, embedded systems, and more.

Are you a C++ developer? Do you have experience in building Java-based applications? Are you looking for long-term, high-paying remote jobs at top companies in the US? Try Turing.com!

Turing offers better stability, career growth, and higher compensation for software developers. If you have more than 3 years of experience as a software developer, you should try Turing Jobs. For more information, visit the Apply for Jobs page now.


FAQs

  1. Which is better C++ or Java?
    Java is highly modular and performs great on all kinds of platforms. Java is faster with short code execution However, C++ outperforms Java in long code execution.

  2. Which is more powerful C++ or Java?
    C++ is closer to hardware and has better object management, performance, and speed. Thus, C++ is more powerful than Java, especially for compiling and running large applications.

  3. Should I learn C++ or Java in 2022?
    Java is a beginner-friendly language that is ideal for junior developers. C++ has a steeper learning curve than Java.

    C++ is the 4th most popular programming language in 2022, with millions of jobs for remote developers. Java is used across various industries like big data, IoT, AI, ML, and more, as major companies are always looking for experienced Java developers. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 15, 2022
Adonis JS vs Express JS: Key Differences
Software Comparisons

Adonis JS Vs Express JS: Which is the Best MVC framework?

Adonis JS vs Express JS: Adonis JS is a full-fledged MVC framework. Express JS is a minimalistic framework. Adonis has its own ORM – Lucid, while Express doesn’t have a built-in ORM.

What is Node JS? What is the advantage of Adonis? Which is better, NodeJS or ExpressJS? Which is the best JS framework between Adonis and Express? Who wins the Adonis JS vs Express JS battle? 

Keep reading this post to find out.

One of the biggest innovations of the world wide web is the ability to create applications with scalable web servers. However, almost a decade ago, creating web servers was tedious. The most popular web server software – Apache HTTP server, had a lot of limitations.

The Apache HTTP server could not handle 10,000 or more concurrent connections. The sequential programming method for creating Apache code blocked the entire process or required multiple execution stacks. Ryan Dahl solved this bottleneck by creating Node.js – a low-level I/O API, an event loop, and Google’s V8 JavaScript Engine.

What is Node.js? 

Node.js is a back-end JavaScript runtime system that runs on Google’s V8 JavaScript Engine. Node.js executes JavaScript code external to a browser and lets developers write command line tools with JavaScript. Node.js features server-side scripting that produces dynamic web page content before the page loads in the browser. 

Node.js unifies web app development with a single programming language – JavaScript for server-side and client-side scripts. Node.js features an event-driven architecture with asynchronous input/output. Companies like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, LinkedIn, IBM, Yahoo!, Walmart, PayPal, Netflix, SAP, GoDaddy, and Rakuten use Node.js.

Node.js frameworks

Node.js frameworks are workspace platforms that support web development with Node.js and use JavaScript for front-end and back-end development. Node.js frameworks can build functions and create unique capabilities for Node.js applications. There are three types of Node.js frameworks: 1) MVC frameworks, 2) Full-stack MVC frameworks, and 3) REST API frameworks.

Related Post: Why and When to Use Node.js? A Brief Guide.

What is an MVC framework?

Model-View-Controller frameworks feature an important design pattern that separates application logic into three parts: models, views, and controllers. The separation makes web development an easy, efficient, and scalable process. 

Express JS and Adonis JS are two of the most popular MVC frameworks based on Node.js.

What is Adonis JS?

Adonis JS is a fully featured back-end framework for Node.js. It creates dynamic data-driven web apps or API servers. Adonis JS can handle HTTP requests, database queries, data validation, user authentication protocols, file transfers, email handling, and a lot more.

Adonis JS is an MVC framework that is based on the Laravel architecture. The concepts of dependency injection are employed with Inversion of Control (IOC). Adonis JS is ideal for developing fast web applications and web-based services that must return JSON responses from a controller.

What is Express JS?

Express JS is a minimalistic Node.js framework with a simple learning curve. A basic understanding of Node.js functionalities is enough to work with Express JS. Companies like Uber, Accenture, IBM, Twitter, Trustpilot, and Stack use Express JS to develop and deploy web applications. 

Express JS features rapid server-side programming packages, template engines, and process managers. The asynchronous programming of Express JS results in better performance, as multiple operations can be executed simultaneously and independently. The simplicity, flexibility, and scalability of Express JS make it a popular choice among other Node.js frameworks.

Adonis JS vs Express JS: What is the difference?

Both of these Node.js frameworks have quite a few differences, unique features, and factors that separate them from each other. Let us learn in-depth about the differences between Adonis JS vs Express JS.

  1. Architecture

    Adonis JS is a Node.js MVC framework useful for creating scalable web applications. Every Adonis JS project is deployed with a well-defined set of folders and files. So, developers must understand the underlying structure of folders before they start developing with Adonis JS.

    Express JS, on the other hand, is very minimalistic and flexible. It can be used with any database, object-relational mapping (ORM), or folder structure. Even junior developers can set up the back-end side of web applications easily and quickly with Express JS.
  2. Object-Relational Mapping (ORM)

    Object-Relational Mapping, or ORM, is a programming technique that uses the object-oriented programming language to create a ‘virtual database’ within the framework. Every framework has its ORM, and the ORM of Adonis JS is ‘Lucid.’ Lucid can quickly build queries, run seeds and factories, create and manage migrations, and hosts data modeling capabilities.

    Express JS does not ship with its ORM. Express JS supports many 3rd-party Node.js ORMs like Sequelize, Bookshelf, and Waterline. Developers can also choose to write plain SQL queries or use query builders like knex.js, instead of using a dedicated ORM.
  3. Routing 

    A routing system defines how the application endpoints (URLs) respond to the web client’s requests. The Express Router hosts basic HTTP routing functionalities like app.get( ), app.post( ), and so on. The app.use( ) method route specifies middleware as the callback function.|

    Adonis JS hosts robust routing functionalities and allows the developers to bind routes to controllers. The Route.group method enables developers to group multiple routes and configure them instead of re-defining the same properties for every route. Using the Route module, routes are generally defined in the start/routes.ts file.

    Related Post: 12 Best Node js Frameworks for 2024
  4. Authentication

    Adonis 5 features an authentication system that greatly reduces the time required for its development. The system supports three types of authentication: basic HTTP authentication, web sessions, and API-based tokens. The support for authentication relies on the @adonisjs/auth package, which relies on the Lucid package.

    Express JS does not have its own authentication system. Developers use third-party tools like Okta and integrate them with Express JS to handle user authentication. 
  5. Performance

    The Adonis JS version 5 adds a few micro-optimizations and performance tweaks to the backend framework. Consistent updates of Adonis JS have led to great results with the HTTP server and the validator. Now, the HTTP server is almost on par with the benchmarks of Fastify.js.

    Express JS also performs great. However, it does not run as fast as Fastify. Express JS is more popular and stable than Fastify and does not compromise the I/O performance of Node.js.
  6. Emails

    For Adonis JS, the official adonisjs/mail package can send emails from the web application. The package relies internally on the Nodemailer module for transferring emails. The package also supports AWS SES, Mailgun, Sparkpost and SMTP.

    The Nodemailer module can also be used with Express JS, but the drivers must be set up manually before the emails deploy. 
  7. Templates

    Adonis JS hosts a templating engine – Edge. Edge can be used to create loops, layouts, components, add conditions, and a few more tasks. Edge can also inspect templates and debug them with a built-in tool. 

    Express JS does not have any templating engine. Developers can create their own templating engine with the app.engine(ext, callback) method. Since creating templating engine is very time-consuming, Express supports many external third-party templating engines. 

Adonis JS vs Express JS: Bottomline

Express is essentially a microframework that can be used to quickly build applications with Node.js. Adonis JS, on the other hand, Adonis JS is a full-featured Node.js framework that is Typescript-first. 

Both are exceptional Node.js frameworks and offer great benefits to web developers.   Depending on the requirements, developers can choose either of the two for their web applications. 

Are you a Node.js developer? Do you have 3+ years of experience as a software developer? Are you looking for high-paying remote software developer jobs? Try Turing.

Turing offers long-term, remote software jobs for developers. More than 3 million developers have signed up for Turing jobs. Turing guarantees steady career growth with an opportunity to work for the biggest companies in the U.S.


FAQs

  1. What is the advantage of Adonis?
    Adonis is a complete MVC framework in itself. Adonis has many advantages like powerful analytical tools, easy migration, and offers an efficient collaborative environment. It hosts smart BPMN, modeling, and personalized views. AdonisJS is easy to set up and configure with high transparency.

  2. Which is better, NodeJS or ExpressJS?
    ExpressJS is based on NodeJS, so it offers more features. ExpressJS makes it very easy to set up web servers with minimum configurations and has faster setup timelines. ExpressJS can perform the same tasks that NodeJS can; in a faster, efficient, and effortless manner.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 8, 2022
Unit testing vs integration testing: Key differences
Software Comparisons

Unit Testing vs Integration Testing: 4 Key Differences Explained

Unit testing vs Integration testing: Unit testing is the process of checking the functionality of a particular piece of code. Integration testing is the process.

Unit testing vs Integration testing, which is better? Can we do integration testing without unit testing? What is the main purpose of integration testing? What are two types of integration testing? What are unit testing tools?

This blog will help you answer all these questions. 

What is unit testing?

Unit testing is the type of testing wherein components or units of a software undergo testing. Unit testing happens during the development phase of the application to ensure that each part of the software performs design-specific functions.

By using unit testing, developers can conclude whether the tested part is ready to use or not. Unit testing isolates a part of the software to check it separately not affecting other parts of the software. Using the isolation technique, developers identify bugs in the early stage of development which keep the cost of fixing bugs low.

Unit testing

Unit testing is the process of checking the code of different software modules.

What is integration testing?

Integration testing is a type of software testing in which the different units, modules or components of a software application are tested as a combined entity. Integration testing ensures that two separate modules work seamlessly together.

By using integration testing, developers can combine different modules of separate software and integrate the modules into an end product. This testing method tests whether the two modules communicate with each other properly. 

Using dummy programs, developers can simulate the missing part of a software module that is not allowing smooth communication. Later they can code that part into the module.

Integration testing

Integration testing is the process of checking whether two software modules work together or not.

Here are the key differences between unit and integration testing.

  1. Unit testing vs Integration testing: Team size

    Unit testing does not require a team of developers to check pieces of code. A single developer can easily perform software unit testing.

    On the other hand, integration testing requires a team of developers. The team of developers prepares test plans, designs test cases, run multiple tests, and identifies and fixes key issues with system integration testing.

    Check out this blog to know 4 Qualities of High Performing Teams.
  2. Unit testing vs Integration testing: Code accessibility

    To perform unit testing, code accessibility is necessary as developers need to check the written code.

    Unlike unit testing, integration testing does not require code accessibility as developers only need to check the interfaces and module interactions.
  3. Unit testing vs Integration testing: System-wide issues

    Software unit testing checks software parts and modules for issues. Developers only check the code and software functionality. They do not check any system issues.

    System integration testing checks for the connection between two or more modules. By doing this, developers check any system-wide issues that arise from the modules used for integration.
  4. Unit testing vs Integration testing: Bug detection

    Bug detection in software unit testing is easy as developers check the piece of code, identify the issue, and rewrite the code to fix the issue.

    On the other hand, bug detection in system integration testing takes more time as developers need to understand the origin of the bug, find the solution and test the performance of the new approach. 

    Other key differences

    Unit testing vs Integration testing: Key differences

    Main differences between integration testing and unit testing

What are some of the common unit testing tools?

Some of the common unit testing tools are as follows:

  1. Junit: Junit helps conduct unit tests for Java programming language software applications. Junit helps test software data and code and offers assertions for the test method in use.

  2. PHPUnit: PHP programmers can use PHPUnit for software unit testing that allows you to check small pieces of code individually.

  3. JMockit: JMockit is an open-source unit testing tool based on the Java framework. JMockit helps mock objects in testing and uses instrumentation APIs to alter code during runtime. 

Related Post: 7 Popular Open Source Tools to Checkout 

What are the common approaches to integration testing?

Some of the common approaches to integration testing are as follows:

  1. Big bang testing

    In this testing method, developers combine all the modules of a system as one unit and conduct integration tests. 

  2. Top-down testing

    With this method, developers test the modules from top to the bottom. Top-down system integration testing checks the top modules before moving to the lower modules.

  3. Bottom-up testing

    This method tests the modules from bottom to top. Bottom-up system integration testing checks the bottom modules before moving to the higher modules. 

Summary

Unit testing determines whether a particular module or part of the software works as per expectation by checking the code. Integration testing, on the other hand, determines whether different modules work together in a software system

Unit testing and integration testing are important stages in the software development cycle. Developers well-versed with unit testing or integration testing can help organizations develop excellent software in an efficient and timely manner.

Are you experienced in the unit or integration testing?

Turing can help you get your dream job. 

Turing offers long-term high paying remote software jobs in top US jobs companies. Visit our Jobs page to know more. 


FAQs

  1. What are two types of unit testing?

    The two types of unit testing are manual testing and automated testing. Manual unit testing involves writing the code by hand whereas automated unit testing uses prewritten code script to solve common issues.

  2. Is integration testing part of functional testing?

    No, integration testing is not a part of functional testing. Integration testing tests different modules for interaction in a system whereas functional testing tests the functionality of all parts of a software application.

  3. What are the steps in integration testing?

    The steps in integration testing include preparing the test plan, designing test cases, test scenarios, use cases and scripts, module integration, error detection, bug fixing, and retesting functionalities.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Sep 6, 2022
Laravel vs CodeIgniter
Software Comparisons

Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Which PHP Framework Is Better?

Laravel vs CodeIgniter: CodeIgniter is a PHP framework that is an elegant toolkit to build feature-rich web applications. Laravel is an open-source PHP …

Is Laravel good for big projects? What are the advantages of CodeIgniter? Which is easy to learn, Laravel or CodeIgniter? Is Laravel front-end or back-end? Which is the fastest PHP framework?

This blog will help you answer these questions. 

Developers can choose between CodeIgniter and Laravel as per the project requirement, framework knowledge, use cases, etc. A detailed comparison between these two popular PHP frameworks can help developers make the right choice.

What is Laravel?

Laravel is an open-source PHP framework that helps build robust applications with less code. Based on model-view-controller architecture, the Laravel framework offers an integrated packaging system and a devoted dependency manager. 

Applications built using the Laravel framework are highly scalable and have easy-to-maintain codebases. Laravel features include an extensive library with reusable components, web development tools, command line interfaces, and object-relational mapping, among others. 

What is CodeIgniter?

CodeIgniter is an open-source PHP framework that helps build dynamic, fully functional web pages. CodeIgniter offers a rich set of libraries to perform common and repetitive tasks. CodeIgniter framework uses a simple interface and logical structure to access the set of libraries.

Applications built using CodeIgniter have excellent database and session management. CodeIgniter features include flexible URL routing, full page caching, error logging, and form and data validation, among others.

According to statistics, 119,000 websites are currently using CodeIgniter, whereas 6,45,000 websites are using Laravel. Popular websites built using CodeIgniter include Buffer, The Mail and Guardian, Nissan, and Creditflux. On the other hand, popular websites built using Laravel include Watchseries, Laracast, Alphacoders, and Barchart, among others. 

Now, let’s compare the two.

1. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Unit Testing

Laravel provides a built-in unit testing feature named PHPUnit. PHPUnit allows developers to check the application code thoroughly.

CodeIgniter does not offer any built-in unit testing support. Developers using the CodeIgniter framework must use third-party unit testing tools to check code quality and application

2. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Learning Curve

CodeIgniter framework has a shallow learning curve making it easier for developers to learn and practice with CodeIgniter.

Laravel framework has a steep learning curve, with developers taking some time to learn and practice with Laravel.

3. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Authentication

In CodeIgniter, developers must write custom CodeIgniter extensions for user authentication and authorization.

On the other hand, Laravel offers the authentication class feature to execute authentication and authorization for web applications. 


Related Post: CakePHP vs Laravel: Here’s What You Should Know about These Popular PHP Frameworks

4. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: HTTP routes

By using the Laravel framework, developers can define custom HTTP routes. Developers can also create a specific URL for each HTTP route.

CodeIgniter uses the response and request mechanism to set up HTTP routes. Developers must create paths to facilitate data transmission.


5. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: DBMS support

The Laravel framework offers support for Oracle, IBM, DB2, PostgreSQL OrientDB, JDBC, and MYSQL among others.

CodeIgniter also offers support for the above-mentioned database management systems, excluding IBM and JDBC. Additionally, the CodeIgniter framework supports Microsoft BI and MongoDB.

Check out this post to learn more about MongoDB and its features.

6. Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Modularity features

Laravel provides in-built modules that allow developers to divide parts of a big project into smaller modules. By doing this, developers can work on them separately.

Unlike Laravel, the CodeIgniter framework does not have any in-built modules. Developers must use extensions to create and maintain separate modules.

What are the advantages of Laravel?

The advantages of Laravel include

  • Proper documentation
  • Integration with mail services 
  • Fewer repetitive tasks
  • Short product development cycle
  • Excellent exceptional handling 
  • Smooth database migration
  • Cache integration 
  • High level of security
  • Fast debugging 
  • Automated testing 

What are the advantages of CodeIgniter?

The advantages of CodeIgniter include 

  • Instant configuration
  • Secure platform
  • User-friendly interface
  • Migration support services 
  • Community support
  • Test-driven development 
  • Error-handling 
  • Website customizability 
  • Lightweight framework 

Other key differences between Laravel and CodeIgniter 

Laravel vs CodeIgniter: Key Differences

7 differences between Laravel and CodeIgniter.

Summary

The Laravel framework was launched five years after the CodeIgniter framework. Laravel is an advanced PHP framework that provides seamless updates and integration. In the Laravel vs CodeIgniter battle, Laravel does have the edge over CodeIgniter because of the elegant and advanced features it provides.

However, developers must choose their PHP framework as per the project’s requirements. In addition, they must carefully weigh the pros and cons of each PHP framework to make an informed decision.

Are you an experienced Laravel or CodeIgniter developer looking for a job?

Turing can help.

Turing offers remote software developers long-term jobs with unmatched compensation at top US companies. Visit our Jobs page to know more. 

FAQs 

  1. Is Laravel good for big projects?
    Laravel is a flexible PHP framework that offers a wide range of features to successfully implement big projects. 
  1. Is Laravel front-end or back-end?
    Laravel is a back-end PHP framework that helps you build modern websites and applications. 
  1. Is CodeIgniter easy to learn?
    Yes, CodeIgniter is quite easy to learn for developers. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Aug 20, 2022
GraphQL vs Rest API
Software Comparisons

GraphQL vs Rest API: 3 Differences You Must Know

REST API uses a set of constraints for developing web services. GraphQL is useful in executing queries to fetch existing data…..

GraphQL vs Rest: Is GraphQL better than Rest API? Is there a big difference between GraphQL and Rest API? What are the advantages of the REST API? Is GraphQL good for microservices?

This post will help you answer all these questions. Let’s get started.

Application Programming Interfaces or APIs allow software applications with distinct functions to access data and communicate with operating systems, microservices, and external software components. The four common ways in which APIs communicate are SOAP APIs, Websocket APIs, RPC APIs, and REST APIs. 

REST is an architectural style that helps develop APIs. In the REST API, the client sends server requests as data, and the server returns output data to the client. The client requests are in the form of a URL, and the server response is in plain text instead of a graphical rendering of web pages.

On the other hand, GraphQL is a flexible and efficient data query language that solves common data retrieval problems by integrating APIs. GraphQL requests allow developers to pull data from different sources in a single API call.

Rest API and GraphQL are different methods for data retrieval. This post will take you through both APIs to help you make the right choice. 

What is the REST API?

Representational State Transfer or REST is a popular software architectural style that helps develop web services using a set of constraints. REST, a.k.a. The REST API, provides an easy way of accessing web services using only HTTP requests. The client sends a request to the server as a URL through the REST API. 

The REST request is made up of an HTTP method, endpoint, body, and header. An endpoint contains the uniform resource identifier, headers contain information for caching, authentication, and AB testing, and the body contains information about the request payload.  

There are five common HTTP commands in REST-based architecture, namely GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, and PATCH, for client-server communication. When paired with data, these methods perform CREATE, DELETE, READ and UPDATE operations. 

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is an open-source data query and manipulation language for APIs. GraphQL is useful for executing queries with existing data. GraphQL can optimize RESTful API calls that offer a declarative way of updating and fetching your data. 

With GraphQL, developers can choose the type of requests to load data from server to client and ask for specific pieces of data. GraphQL is made up of schema, resolve functions and queries. 

GraphQL schema defines the hierarchy of fields and types from data-back stores to describe the shape of data. The GraphQL schema specifies the available queries and mutations for clients to execute. To connect the data to the graph, you must write resolve functions and specify the details in the query to fetch relevant data. 

Here are the key differences between GraphQL and REST API: 

  • GraphQL vs Rest API: Usability 

    GraphQL allows you to send a request to your API to get the exact result without requiring any other inclusions. Thus, GraphQL queries return highly predictable results providing excellent usability. GraphQL follows a simple approach and does not version APIs.

    The REST API utilizes HTTP and URI methods that make it difficult for the API to predict what will happen while calling a new endpoint. REST does not have standardized guidelines for versioning, allowing providers to use their own approach.
  • GraphQL vs Rest API: Security 

    REST API uses HTTP, supports Transfer Layer Security encryption, and offers multiple API authentication methods. TLS ensures that the data exchange between two systems is unmodified and private. JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) web tokens complete the HTTP authentication for secure data transfer from web browsers.

    The security measures in GraphQL are not as mature as the ones in the REST API. Developers need to come up with authentication and authorization methods while utilizing existing features like data validation in GraphQL.
  • GraphQL vs REST API: Performance 

    In GraphQL, developers can retrieve data in a single API request. The flexible style defines the structure of information requests and returns the same structure from the server, which prevents data from under-fetching and over-fetching.

    Unlike GraphQL, REST APIs have inflexible data structures that can return unwanted data before returning the right information. Developers have to make multiple calls as requests take time to hit the right data and return relevant information. 

Related Post: How to Use Python for Data Scraping and Data Wrangling

What are the advantages of GraphQL? 

  • GraphQL queries are executed within the context of particular systems.
  • Keeps documentation in sync with APIs.
  • Developers do not have to define variables, as GraphQL is statically typed. 
  • Product-centric and hierarchical. 
  • Useful in caching and query batching.
  • Supports rapid application prototyping.
  • Offers readable queries. 
  • Deals with multiple databases.
  • Contains features of the application layer of the OSI model. 
  • Enables schema discovery in an appropriate format. 
  • Evolution of API without versioning. 
  • Reusable fields. 

What are the advantages of the REST API?

  • Scales software with ease. 
  • Creates explicit process instances. 
  • Provides development protocols across projects. 
  • Offers several project environments.
  • No requirement for routing information for the client machine.
  • Developers can build user-specific APIs. 
  • Decouples clients and server architectures.
  • Supports various data formats like plain text, JSON, and HTML.
GraphQL vs Rest API

GraphQL vs Rest API

Related Post: Top 21 SQL Interview Questions and Answers for 2022

Summary  

Be it designing an API product, or fetching data from different web sources, GraphQL and REST API provide several unique and similar features. REST API is ideal for robust authentication and caching of web services, whereas, GraphQL provides a modern design style and utilizes a single request for fetching data. 

Developers must consider the pros and cons of GraphQL and the REST API along with the project requirements and size to choose the best API. 

Are you an experienced API developer looking for a job?

Try Turing!

Turing helps software developers land their dream remote jobs in top US companies with long-term career growth and unmatched compensation. Visit the Apply for Jobs page to know more!


FAQs

  1. Is GraphQL good for microservices?
    GraphQL allows you to model your data into graphs that help multiple applications work together.
     
  2. What are the best languages for REST API?
    REST API mainly utilizes XML and JSON for data communication and Ruby on Rails, Python, and JavaScript for programming. 

  3. Is GraphQL scalable?
    Yes, GraphQL is scalable to the extent that each component is independent of one another. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Jul 31, 2022
CherryPy vs Flask
Software Comparisons

Flask vs CherryPy: What Should Python Developers Choose?

Flask and CherryPy are non-full stack Python frameworks that offer unique features to help developers build fast and flexible web applications…….

What is CherryPy used for? Is Flask worth learning in 2022? Which web framework should I learn in Python? Which framework is most used in Python? 

This blog post will help you answer all these questions. Let’s get started. 

Python is one of the most popular programming languages that offer a wide range of web frameworks. Python web frameworks are collections of modules and packages that help developers create web applications and services. Python frameworks are of two types: full stack and non-full stack.

Full stack frameworks provide complete solutions for application development, including form validation, template layouts, and form generators, among others. Popular Python full-stack frameworks include Django, Turbogears, web2py, Cubicweb, Giotto, Grok, Pylons, and more.

On the other hand, non-full stack frameworks help create small applications relying on modules in the Python library. Popular Python non-full stack frameworks include  CherryPy, Flask, Hug, Pyramid, Albatross, Falcon, and more.

What is CherryPy?

CherryPy web framework

CherryPy is a minimalistic Python web framework for web development.

CherryPy is a Pythonic object-oriented programming system that helps developers build fast and reliable web applications. It is one of the oldest Python frameworks. CherryPy enables developers to create a database-driven web application with less source code. This framework offers to create, retrieve, delete and update functions.

What is Flask?

Flask web framework

Flask is a popular Python microframework used for web development.

Flask is a lightweight Python microframework that provides essential features like routing, request handling, and more. Flask offers suggestions but does not impose any project layout or dependencies. Developers can choose the tools and libraries they want to use as per the project. This framework features a WSGI toolkit and a Jinja2 template engine.

Here are the key differences between Flask and CherryPy:

  1. Flask vs CherryPy: Application security

    CherryPy offers built-in features that can help you with security solutions like user authorization, encoding, caching, and more. Additionally, it offers several tools for application testing and debugging.

    Flask, on the other hand, allows several security mechanisms that developers can add to Flask applications. This framework includes password hashing, token-based authentication, cross-site scripting, and JSON security. However, developers must set up a content security policy to protect application data while using Flask.

  2. Flask vs CherryPy: Templating engine

    Flask’s templating engine Jinja helps developers access both static and dynamic template files. The pre-built Web Server Gateway Interface WSGI toolkit in Flask allows you to receive templating requests from web servers that you can integrate into the final document.

    Unlike the Flask framework, CherryPy does not have a templating engine. However, developers can easily integrate different templates like Cheetah, Jinja2, and Mako, among others, into the framework.

  3. Flask vs CherryPy: Libraries and community support

    The Flask framework has several external libraries and third-party utilities that you can integrate with your projects. Flask offers rich community support that helps developers resolve any issues that arise during software development.

    Similarly, CherryPy is a flexible and highly scalable framework that offers seamless integration with Python libraries and modules. However, the community support for CherryPy is significantly low, meaning developers must resolve the issue on their own.

  4. Flask vs CherryPy: Database support

    Flask utilizes Dbadapters to support different databases. Developers can use open-source libraries like Flask-Pony and Flask-SQLAlchemy for object-relational mapping and database support. By utilizing the extensions mentioned above, developers can use open-source libraries like MongoDB, CouchDB, Cassandra, and DynamoDB in Flask.

    Similarly, CherryPy does not offer a built-in relational database management system (RDBMS) or built-in SQL support. Developers must use SQLAlchemy to use different plugins and extensions for databases.

  5. Flask vs CherryPy: Testing

    The Flask framework provides built-in unit testing support using Python’s unit test framework. The unit testing feature allows developers to test portions of source code that determine the usability for each portion.

    Unlike Flask, CherryPy does not provide built-in unit testing support. Developers must rely on modules like Nose and Webtest to test portions of source code.

    Related Post: 12 Most Popular Python Frameworks
Key differences between CherryPy and Flask

Comparison between features of CherryPy and Flask.

Unique features and best use scope of CherryPy

CherryPy offers many unique features that include extensibility, scalability, simple syntax, an HTTP server for application hosting, data abstraction, and easy deployment on WSGI-compliant gateways.

CherryPy is ideal for creating Rest APIs with built-in tools and small-scale applications. Developers do not need extensive documentation, resources, and templates to use this framework.

Unique features and best use scope of Flask

Flask offers several unique features like synchronous request processing, extensive documentation, a good routing system, and conventional data storage.

The Flask framework provides high scalability to start-ups and builds simplistic web APIs and large-scale applications with ease. Also, Flask is a great choice for building project prototypes.

Related Post:  Django vs Flask: Which Framework to Choose?

Summary

CherryPy is a minimalistic Python web framework that allows developers to build web applications with cleaner code in less time. On the other hand, Flask is a microframework that allows you to build a high-functioning web application with a sound structure by compiling different Python modules and libraries

In the CherryPy vs Flask battle, Python developers must consider several factors before making a decision. After all, both frameworks offer unique features and are ideal for specific project requirements. 

Are you an experienced Flask or CherryPy developer looking for a job?

Try Turing!

Turing helps software developers land their dream remote jobs in top US companies with long-term career growth and unmatched compensation. Visit the Apply for Jobs page to know more!


FAQs

Is CherryPy a web server?

CherryPy is a web framework that offers a generic HTTP server and production-ready, thread-pooled, high-speed modularized components to develop web applications.

Is Flask a front-end or back-end framework?

Flask is a back-end framework that allows developers to choose tools, libraries, and extensions for their projects.

Which is better, Flask or Django?

Flask is better for small-scale applications, while Django is great for large-scale applications.

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Jul 19, 2022
Laravel vs CakePHP comparison
Software Comparisons

CakePHP vs Laravel: Here’s What You Should Know about These Popular PHP Frameworks

CakePHP is a fast web development PHP framework that creates web applications with less code. Laravel offers elegant and expressive syntax to build robust…..

Is CakePHP better than Laravel? Is Laravel better than CakePHP? What is the difference between Cake PHP and Laravel? What is CakePHP used for? Is Laravel a coding language? 

This post will help you answer all these questions. 

According to usage statistics, around 6,50,000 websites currently use Laravel, whereas 1,20,000 use CakePHP. Popular websites built using Laravel include Barchart, Alphacoders, Alison, Watchseries, and Laracast. On the other hand, popular websites built using CakePHP are Mapme, Educationunlimited, Eliteperformanceandfitness, Mygasfeed, Followmytv, etc.

Developers can choose between Laravel and CakePHP depending on the project requirement, framework familiarity, and more. A detailed comparison between these two PHP frameworks can help developers choose the best framework for their projects. 

So, let’s find out the key differences between Laravel and CakePHP. 

What is Laravel?

Laravel is an open-source PHP framework that helps create web applications. Laravel offers expressive command-line interfaces, fast web development tools, an extensive library with reusable components, and similar features. 

Developers use Laravel to build robust applications with less code. These applications offer easy-to-maintain codebases and are highly scalable. In addition, Laravel developers use object-relational mapping to access and manipulate databases. 

Laravel PHP framework

Laravel is a popular open-source PHP framework.

What is CakePHP?

CakePHP is also an open-source PHP framework that facilitates the efficient development and maintenance of web applications. Cake PHP offers built-in validation, safe request handling, unit testing, business logic support, and other similar features.

Developers can leverage CakePHP’s environment flexibility to build fast web applications. Also, CakePHP provides support for databases like MYSQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Lite, and more.

Now, let’s compare the two.

  1. Usage  

    Laravel and CakePHP are open-source frameworks. However, Laravel is free to use and operate. In contrast, CakePHP requires a license to operate and use.

    Laravel attracts more developers with its free-to-use feature in comparison to CakePHP.

  2. Architecture

    Laravel uses MVC architecture. The model-view-controller architecture has three parts: the model, the view, and the controller. The model handles data of the application, the view displays data to the user, the controller interacts with the model for any data queries, and the view for user inputs and then updates the view accordingly. Laravel offers two-way data binding, which helps developers share and update data in different component classes.

    CakePHP uses Hierarchical-Model-View-Controller (HMVC) architecture. In the HMVC architecture, different components have separate model-view-controller triads that interact with each other to update the application. By using HMVC architecture, CakePHP reduces dependencies, increases reusability, and makes the application more extensible.

    The MVC architecture of Laravel is ideal for enterprise solutions, whereas the HMVC architecture of CakePHP is best suited for small websites.

    Related post:  MVC vs. Flux vs. Redux: What Should You Pick?

  3. Templates

    Laravel uses Blade, a templating engine, to design unique layouts. Developers can use plain PHP code in blade views to create a consistent design and structure. Blade compiles and caches the views in the resources/view directory for easy accessibility.

    Templates in CakePHP are regular PHP files with ctp extensions, using alternative PHP syntax to control output and structures. These templates have the necessary logic to prepare the data sent by the controller into an organized presentation format ready for the user.

    Blade in Laravel does not affect the MVC structure, whereas CakePHP templates can affect the HMVC structure.

  4. Object Relational Mapping

    Both CakePHP and Laravel use Eloquent ORM for building queries and retrieving data. Developers can organize the database quickly with the help of Eloquent ORM.

    However, Laravel offers two ORM options, Query Builder and Eloquent ORM. Both ORMs create bad returns.

    CakePHP, on the other hand, doesn’t create any issues during object-relational mapping, ensuring consistent outcomes.

  5. Security

    CakePHP offers several advanced security features like hashing, encryption, and decryption. Also, CakePHP restricts actions to SSL, prevents form-tampering, handles blackhole call-backs, and limits cross-controller communication.

    However, Laravel only offers basic security features like user authentication, password validation, password reminder and reset protection from cross-site request forgeries, and more.

    Hence, CakePHP offers more security features than Laravel.

  6. Testing

    Laravel offers two ways to test your application- unit testing and feature testing. Feature testing enables you to test your codebase, whereas unit testing allows you to test your classes, models, and controllers.

    CakePHP also offers two types of testing- unit testing and web testing. Unit testing allows you to test small parts of your code, whereas web testing enables you to automate testing for different website components to identify and resolve errors.

    Both Laravel and CakePHP offer good testing features. 

Other key differences

Laravel vs CakePHP

Key differences between CakePHP and Laravel

Related post: 10 PHP Frameworks Developers Should Look Out for in 2022 

So, which PHP framework is better, Laravel or CakePHP?

CakePHP allows developers to work in an organized manner without losing flexibility. By using CakePHP, developers do not have to build applications from scratch. 

Laravel offers several features to build robust web applications. By using Laravel, developers can immediately deploy applications. 

Developers must choose between Laravel and CakePHP as per the project requirements and project timeline. In addition, developers must check out the pros and cons of each framework before making their choice. 

Are you an experienced Laravel or CakePHP developer looking for a job?

Try Turing!

Turing helps software developers land their dream remote jobs in top US companies with long-term career growth and unmatched compensation. Visit the Jobs page to know more!


FAQs 

  1. Is Laravel back-end or front-end?
    Laravel is a back-end framework that helps build server-side applications with features like order management, user accounts, etc. 

  2. Is CakePHP easy to learn?
    CakePHP is a powerful open-source PHP framework that is easy to learn. 

  3. What is Blade in Laravel?
    The Blade is a templating engine in Laravel that offers unique templates and makes syntax writing easy. 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By Jul 7, 2022
Kotlin vs Java Programming Language
Software Comparisons

Kotlin vs. Java: What Should You Choose for Your Next Project?

Kotlin vs Java: Kotlin is an open-source, statically typed, platform-independent programming language. Java is a secure, robust object-oriented programming

Kotlin vs Java: Is Kotlin better than Java? Is there a big difference between Kotlin and Java? This blog post will help you answer all these questions. According to a survey, 36 percent of developers use Java compared to eight percent who use Kotlin. Java has been a popular choice for mobile and web applications for the past two decades. On the other hand, Kotlin is Google’s official programming language for developing Android apps.

Java is an object-oriented programming language, whereas Kotlin supports both object-oriented and functional programming. Popular applications developed using the Kotlin language are Netflix, Uber, Tinder, Airbnb, and Pinterest. Similarly, well-known applications developed using Java are Twitter, Spotify, and LinkedIn.

Is Kotlin replacing Java?

Kotlin language is a popular choice for android development. Kotlin has a range of features that make it more accessible and ideal for android development. However, Kotlin cannot replace Java, which is an old programming language used for several projects other than android development. Millions of developers around the world trust Java for their projects. 

Is Kotlin difficult to learn?

Kotlin language is very easy to learn. Developers interested in Kotlin must master the basics first and then learn more about design and syntax capabilities. Developers with Python or Java backgrounds can learn Kotlin faster.

Let’s take a look at the key differences between Java and Kotlin:

  1. Kotlin vs Java: Extension functions

    In Java, extension functions are not available. Developers need to create a new class and parent class to add this feature.

    Kotlin helps developers easily add extension functions in existing classes. Developers must prefix the name of the class and function to enable extension functions.

  2. Kotlin vs Java: Implicit conversion

    Implicit type conversion is the conversion of a data type automatically by a compiler. There are seven different data types in Java. Data types of the same kind convert to accommodate smaller data types into larger data types. Thus, java supports implicit conversion.

    Kotlin does not support implicit conversion of data types, which means smaller data types do not convert to larger data types.


  3. Kotlin vs Java: Data classes

    Kotlin enables the smart creation of data classes. Developers need to declare the class with keyword data. Afterward, the Kotlin compiler creates constructor, getter, and setter methods automatically.


    Contrarily, developers need to define the constructor, getter, and setter methods in Java to create data classes.

  4. Kotlin vs Java: Language scripting

    Language scripting helps developers execute different functions automatically, which otherwise would require manual operation.


    Kotlin enables language scripting integration in existing scripts, whereas Java does not allow language scripting.

  5. Kotlin vs Java: Operator overloading

    Operator overloading allows the utilization of the same operator on different user-defined data types. Java doesn’t allow operator overloading except for the + function used for addition and concatenation in numeric and string types.


    Kotlin enables the implementation of the pre-defined set of operator types like + and * with precedence. Developers need to specify the member function with the specific name of the corresponding type for the operator modifier to implement overloading.

  6. Kotlin vs Java: Static members

    Java uses static members for memory management. Developers can apply static java keywords to different methods, blocks, variables, and nested classes to make them static members. Also, developers can access these members without instantiating the class.


    Unlike other programming languages, static members in Kotlin do not use static variables in name fields.  Developers must use Kotlin objects to create a companion object inside the class. Since the companion object is single, it acts as a static member allowing direct access without disturbing the containing class.

  7. Kotlin vs Java: String templates and expressions

    String templates are a set of string literals that contain a sequence of characters to display text to a user. In Java, string templates are enclosed within quotation marks but do not allow expressions.


    In Kotlin, there are two types of string templates raw strings and escape string templates. Kotlin allows expressions inside strings that can change the output of a pre-written program.

  8. Kotlin vs Java: Smart cast

    Smart cast is an exclusive feature of the Kotlin language. Developers can use a smart cast to track the object and variable and then safely cast it into the call methods and types.


    Since the smart cast is not available in Java, developers need to perform two separate functions. The first function checks the variable type and the second function casts the object to the target type.

  9. Kotlin vs Java: Type inference

    Type inference is a feature that allows the deduction of data types for specific expressions automatically. Java does not allow type inferences as developers need to specify each variable before a declaration.


    Kotlin allows type inference so that developers do not have to declare the type of each variable separately.  

A competitive analysis of the remaining features:

Kotlin vs Java

Summary

Kotlin is a programming language inspired by Java and developed exclusively for Android development. Developers can get things done with fewer lines of code using the Kotlin language.  However, for developing client-side applications and web applications, developers can choose Java over Kotlin.

In the end, developers should take their pick as per their project’s requirements. They should also list the pros and cons of each language to make an informed decision. 

Are you an experienced Kotlin or Java developer looking for a long-term, high-growth remote job?

Turing can help.

Turing offers remote software developers jobs with unmatched compensation and long-term career growth in top US companies. Visit the Jobs page to know more. 

 

Which programming language will you choose for your project ?

 

FAQs 

How is Kotlin different from Java?

Kotlin is an enhanced version of Java. The language improves on Java aspects that previously made Android development time-consuming. Kotlin is faster and can compile code in fewer lines than Java. 

Should I learn Java before learning Kotlin?

Developers who are just starting out must learn Java to code well. Java is one of the oldest programming languages, so understanding Java basics help learn newer programming languages like Kotlin. 

What are the features of Kotlin?

Kotlin has many smart features like smart casts, lazy loading, null safety, and exception handling, among others. 

 

Join a network of the world's best developers and get long-term remote software jobs with better compensation and career growth.

Apply for Jobs

By May 10, 2022